Skip to content
Howell a and Ann M Breedlove Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Howell a and Ann M Breedlove Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$71kArts & Culture$68kReligion$51kHealth$48kEducation$42kEnvironment$20kHuman Services$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CLAIR HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART$3,500
DIOCESE OF CHEYENNE - LIVING & GIVING IN CHRIST$2,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE - WLG$2,500
GREEN BERET FOUNDATION$750
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $750 → 16%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $521 → 16%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
WY
PA
CA
CO
WV
MD
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 22 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
25

Total granted

$307k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +83%
  • GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +113%
  • SJ
    St John's Health Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +482%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH CAMPAIGN OFFICE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +13%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
St Luke Community Hospital

The mission of st. luke community healthcare is to remain an integral component of the communities of the mission valley through the delivery of personal, compassionate, quality health care in a dignified manner that values our patients,…

Health
7
Johnston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Johnston health foundation seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people in our communities by supporting the patients, programs, and services of unc health johnston. the foundation seeks to be a philanthropic leader and…

—
8
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
9
Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance

The mission of the jackson hole conservation alliance is to protect the wildlife, wild places and community character of jackson hole.

Environment
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Beret Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST CLAIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $21,000 · OtherST CLAIR HEALTH FOUNDATIONDIOCESE OF CHEYENNE - LIVING & GIVING IN CHRIST: $17,500 · OtherDIOCESE OF CHEYENNE - LIVING & GIVING IN CHRISTDIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH CAMPAIGN OFFICE: $15,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH CAMPAIGN OFFICEIndividual grant recipient: $12,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBF Jones Memorial Library: $10,000 · OtherBF Jones Memorial LibraryLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $7,500 · OtherST JOHN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Other+26 more: $41,251 · Other+26 moreGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $43,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON NATIONAL P…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $28,550 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION O…Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES: $66,484 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSEUM OF W…DANCERS WORKSHOP: $3,000 · Arts & CultureOGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $17,500 · EducationEmory University: $7,000 · Education+2 more: $700 · EducationSt John's Health Foundation: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $120 · HealthJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $20,000 · EnvironmentYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5,000 · Human ServicesGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $2,771 · Human Services
Other$163,951Philanthropy$77,050Arts & Culture$69,484Education$25,200Health$25,120Environment$20,000Human Services$7,771

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES: $66,484 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $28,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBF Jones Memorial Library: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $7,500 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetEmory University: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTETON COUNTY SHERIFF'S AUXILIARY: $3,031 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDANCERS WORKSHOP: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $2,771 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENTRY SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSISTERS PLACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIC ALERT FOUNDATION UNITED STATES: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL RESCUE TEAM SOUTH AUTHORITY: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BF Jones Memorial Library ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TETON COUNTY SHERIFF'S AUXILIARY ↗
  • Who funds DANCERS WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENTRY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Community Foundation …Shell USA Company Fou…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howell a and Ann M Breedlove Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howell a and Ann M Breedlove Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howell a and Ann M Breedlove Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Howell a and Ann M Breedlove Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howell a and Ann M Breedlove’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home