Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard Family Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$15kEnvironment$7kInternational$5kHealth$4kHuman Services$4kEducation$4kReligion$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
3
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northside Residents Redevelopment Council$1,000
We Care Solar$1,000
Alliance Francaise Mpls St Paul$800
Como Snowsports Booster Club$650
Samos Volunteers Syrian refugees$500
Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Cnt$500
Fred Wells Tennis and Education Cnt$500
Annunciation House$500
Planned Parenthood$400
Our Justice$400
Family Tree Clinic$400
Carleton College$400
Native American Community Clinic$300
Individual grant recipient$300
Century College$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Family Pathways: $800 → 5%Family Pathways: $300 → 5%Family Pathways: $300 → 5%Family Pathways: $200 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37k · 21 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$37k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+70%

Still filing today

52%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WE CARE SOLAR
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +103%
  • PS
    PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +287%
  • WR
    WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • CW
    Cycling Withoug Age Twin Cities
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +137%
  • MJ
    MONARCH JOINT VENTUREgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +196%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
2
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
3
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
4
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
5
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
6
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
7
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
11
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
12
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Serving People Inc; the most unlike its peers is Century College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cycling Withoug Age Twin Cities: $10,000 · OtherCycling Withoug Age Twin CitiesSamos Volunteers Syrian Refugees: $3,600 · OtherSamos Volunteers Syrian RefugeesComo Snowsports Booster Club: $2,950 · OtherComo Snowsports Booster ClubANNUNCIATION HOUSE INC: $2,000 · OtherANNUNCIATION HOUSE INCLove One Another: $2,000 · OtherLove One AnotherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLas Americas Immigrant Advocacy Cnt: $1,900 · OtherLas Americas Immigrant Advocacy CntCentury College: $1,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,200 · OtherALIGHT: $1,600 · OtherFamily Pathways: $1,600 · Other+8 more: $3,600 · Other+8 moreWE CARE SOLAR: $6,500 · HealthWE CARE SOLAROUR JUSTICE: $800 · HealthOUR JUSTICEFamily Tree Inc: $700 · HealthFamily Tree IncNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $600 · HealthNATIVE AMERICAN CO…CARLETON COLLEGE: $1,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationMONARCH JOINT VENTURE: $500 · EducationCENTURY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $400 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $100 · EducationPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC: $1,900 · Housing & ShelterFRED WELLS TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,600 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $200 · Recreation & SportsWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $1,700 · AnimalsALLIANCE FRANCAISE DE MPLS-ST PAUL: $800 · Arts & CultureARTREACH ST CROIX: $700 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$33,850Health$8,600Education$2,600Housing & Shelter$1,900Recreation & Sports$1,800Animals$1,700Arts & Culture$1,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWE CARE SOLAR: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC: $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Pathways: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRED WELLS TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $1,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSIDE RESIDENTS REDEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FRANCAISE DE MPLS-ST PAUL: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR JUSTICE: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Tree Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTREACH ST CROIX: $700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH JOINT VENTURE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTURY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds Family Pathways ↗
  • Who funds FRED WELLS TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE RESIDENTS REDEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FRANCAISE DE MPLS-ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds OUR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Family Tree Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTREACH ST CROIX ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH JOINT VENTURE ↗
  • Who funds CENTURY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTREACH ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard Family Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Howard Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howard Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph