Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard & Jacqueline Chertkof Foundation Inc C/O Susan Chertkof

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$65kEducation$10kCivil Rights$8kInternational$7kHealth$7kCrime & Legal$6kFood & Nutrition$6kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$380k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE SINAI$11,500
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,000
NYU LAW SCHOOL$1,000
IFWHENHOW$750
THE RED TENT FUND$750
FRIENDSHIP PLACE$750
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON$500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGAN DAVID$500
MANNA FOODBANK ASHVILLE$500
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$500
HILLEL INTL$500
HIAS$500
AVALON THEATER FOUNDATION$500
JOHN AND LILLIAN MILES LEWIS FDN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $500 → 8%THE RED TENT FUND: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119k · 39 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
9

Total granted

$119k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+4%

Still filing today

38%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HIAS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +41%
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +37%
  • FP
    Friendship Place
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • TO
    TIKKUN OLAM WOMEN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • DC ABORTION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $750 · revenue +244%
  • ST
    SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
3
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
6
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
7
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
8
Anti-Defamation League

Anti-defamation league (the "league") is a leading anti-hate organization that was founded in 1913 in response to an escalating climate of antisemitism and bigotry. (continued in sch. o)its timeless mission is to stop the defamation of the…

Civil Rights
9
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
10
J Street

To organize pro-israel, pro-peace, pro-democracy americans to promote us policies that embody our deeply held jewish and democratic values and that help secure the state of israel as a democratic homeland for the jewish people.

International
11
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
12
Jews United for Justice Inc

Jews united for justice advances economic, racial, and social justice in the baltimore-washington region by educating and mobilizing our local jewish communities to action.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Dc Abortion Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE SINAI: $57,000 · OtherTEMPLE SINAIANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,500 · Other+45 more: $45,340 · Other+45 moreHIAS INC: $3,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $2,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,400 · InternationalTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $3,750 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyJOHN AND LILLIAN MILES LEWIS FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $3,450 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,750 · HealthABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC: $1,200 · HealthMobile Medical Care Inc: $950 · HealthTRACYS KIDS INC: $950 · HealthEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $3,250 · Crime & LegalFriendship Place: $3,050 · Housing & Shelter
Other$106,840International$10,400Philanthropy$5,750Education$4,950Health$4,850Crime & Legal$3,250Housing & Shelter$3,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $3,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFriendship Place: $3,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMobile Medical Care Inc: $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRACYS KIDS INC: $950 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELLINGTON FUND: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED TENT FUND: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDC ABORTION FUND: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN AND LILLIAN MILES LEWIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVALON FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Place ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Medical Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRACYS KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELLINGTON FUND ↗
  • Who funds RED TENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds DC ABORTION FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard & Jacqueline Chertkof Foundation Inc C/O Susan Chertkof funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard & Jacqueline Chertkof Foundation Inc C/O Susan Chertkof. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Mobile Medical Care Inc: 17% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Avalon Foundation Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Howard & Jacqueline Chertkof Foundation Inc C/O Susan Chertkof’s filings →

More from the funding graph