Skip to content

· Public charity

Houston Regional HIV AIDS Resource Group Inc

The mission of the houston regional hiv/aids resource group is to maximize all possible medical, psychosocial and educational resources to help persons affected by or at risk of hiv/aids nationally with primary focus in east and southeast texas.

$12M
Granted FY2021
20
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$52MCrime & Legal$733kHousing & Shelter$677k
02FY2021 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $10,068,589, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,355,689 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,287,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $922k
  • $250k+11 grants · $9.1M
$272,984
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACYMONTROSE CLINICASSIST FUND$2,372,012
SPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES$1,801,081
AVENUE 360 HEALTH & WELLNESS$1,059,030
BROWN FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC$973,861
STHOPE FOUNDATION$854,122
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-MED BRANCH - GALVESTON$491,540
BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SE TEXAS$387,461
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$317,064
AFH AIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON INC$286,531
THE MONTROSE CENTER$272,984
HPI - HARBORPATH INC$262,701
EAST TEXAS CARE$236,525
HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT$149,343
ACCESS CARE OF COASTAL TEXAS INC$147,482
HARRIS HEALTH SYSTEM$118,296
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $5.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AHF AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $105k → 14%AHF AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $90k → 14%AFH AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%STHOPE FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 16%STHOPE FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 16%STHOPE FOUNDATION: $908k → 16%STHOPE FOUNDATION: $854k → 16%STHOPE FOUNDATION: $823k → 16%THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS: $111k → 16%THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS: $58k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 20 repeat orgs$465k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$53M
$465k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+128%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $14M · revenue +264%
  • SH
    SPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $9.4M · revenue +186%
  • HA
    HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5.8M · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • HH
    HEALTH HORIZONS OF EAST TEXAS
    one grant, 2017 · $301k
  • TA
    TRIANGLE AREA NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $121k · revenue +128%
  • SF
    STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spring Branch Community Health Center

To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.

Health
2
Aids Services of Austin Inc

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integrated, personalized, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

Health
3
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
4
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
5
African American Mens Health Clinic

Bmhc is a no wrong-door safety net program for men of color. our patients receive a head-to-toe assessment to address all possible concerns which will inform our health care professionals of the current state of your health. any validated…

Health
6
Healthcare Unity Group Inc

Medical treatment, case management and lab services related to hiv treatment, screening and prevention.

Health
7
Center for Comprehensive Health Practice Inc

The center for comprehensive health practice, inc. provides accessible, community-based treatment that integrates primary healthcare with substance use and behavioral health services for all children, adolescents, adults, and families…

Health
8
Health Services Center Inc

The health services center (hsc), inc. is committed to the provision of quality, comprehensive hiv/aids services to all hiv infected, and affected, persons in our service area.

Health
9
North Central Texas Community Health Care Center

To provide access to quality, affordable, primary care and preventative services by reaching out to everyone, including the underserved. program services are delivered through ten clinical sites located throughout wichita falls, vernon,…

Health
10
Southwest Viral Med Inc

Provider of healthcare services. care and medications to hiv and hepatitis c outpatients in under-served vulnerable population of the southwest united states.

Health
11
Bexar Area Harm Reduction Coalition

To provide harm reduction without judgement to reduce the negative consequences of drug use and promote wellness.

Health
12
Aid Atlanta Inc

The mission of aid atlanta is to reduce hiv infections and improve the quality of life of its members and the community by breaking barriers and building community. we fulfill that mission by providing an array of comprehensive services…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Health Resources for Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $14,112,901 · HealthLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5,775,684 · HealthHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICESBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas: $2,122,894 · HealthBaptist Hospitals of Southeast TexasTexas Children's Hospital: $1,313,601 · HealthThe Montrose Center: $1,252,884 · HealthHARBORPATH INC: $1,182,217 · Health+3 more: $1,365,749 · HealthSPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC: $9,426,578 · OtherSPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS …JOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMB: $2,912,125 · OtherJOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMBACCESS CARE OF COASTAL TEXAS INC: $1,324,333 · OtherACCESS CARE OF COASTAL TEXAS INCEAST TEXAS CARES RESOURCE CENTER: $885,578 · OtherEAST TEXAS CARES RESOURCE CENTERHARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $732,559 · OtherHOUSING AUTHORITY OF BEAUMONT: $676,937 · Other+4 more: $616,322 · OtherSt Hope Foundation Inc: $4,747,420 · Human ServicesSt Hope Foundation I…Brown Family Health Center Inc: $4,500,331 · Human ServicesBrown Family Health …+2 more: $439,504 · Human Services
Health$27,125,930Other$16,574,432Human Services$9,687,255

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $14,112,901 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetSPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC: $9,426,578 over 5y, 12% of budgetHOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5,775,684 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetSt Hope Foundation Inc: $4,747,420 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetBrown Family Health Center Inc: $4,500,331 over 5y, 46% of budgetBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas: $2,122,894 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetACCESS CARE OF COASTAL TEXAS INC: $1,324,333 over 5y, 14% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $1,313,601 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Montrose Center: $1,252,884 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetHARBORPATH INC: $1,182,217 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetAIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON INC: $885,960 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetEAST TEXAS CARES RESOURCE CENTER: $885,578 over 5y, 70% of budgetHarris County Hospital District Foundation: $414,583 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $269,971 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS: $169,533 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTRIANGLE AREA NETWORK INC: $121,164 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFORT BEND FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $65,206 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL HEALTH RESOURCES FOR TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds St Hope Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brown Family Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS CARE OF COASTAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds The Montrose Center ↗
  • Who funds HARBORPATH INC ↗
  • Who funds AIDS FOUNDATION HOUSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CARES RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Harris County Hospital District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE AREA NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT BEND FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AIDS UnitedDC21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AIDS United · The Methodist Hospital · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Direct Relief · Episcopal Health Foundation · Cullen Trust For Health Care · Shell USA Company Foundation · United Way of Greater Houston · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · The Houston Food Bank · Americares Foundation Inc · Texas Mutual Insurance Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Houston Regional HIV AIDS Resource Group Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Houston Regional HIV AIDS Resource Group Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Houston Regional HIV AIDS Resource Group Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Houston Regional HIV AIDS Resource Group Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Houston Regional HIV AIDS Resource Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph