· Private foundation
Horton Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHEDRAL OF FAITH | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- WJWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY7× · 2017–2023 · $547k · revenue +49%
- AIAgape International Missions7× · 2017–2023 · $335k · revenue +119%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE7× · 2017–2023 · $326k · revenue +134%
Funded once
- HLHAL LYNDSEY MEDIA MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · $10k
- SISTUDENTS INTERNATIONALone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +6%
- LOLIVE OAK DAY CARE CENTERone grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious purpose
The mission of our school can be divided into 4 areas:1.To cultivate students exegesis & preaching of the Scriptures rightly based on truth found in Bible. 2.To edify Bible study talents to teach Bible and lead Bible study as the focus of…
To deliver biblically-based education and ministry mentoring through graduate-level degree programs.
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
Religious
None
Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.
The specific purpose of this Corporation is, but not limited to, evangelism; which is to share the love of God expressed in Christ Jesus. To promote evangelism in its many forms, including training and education that promotes the biblical…
His university provides graduate and undergraduate degree and diploma education and training for his family ministry specialists who desire to pursue careers in counseling and ministry.
This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds ADVENT GROUP MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Guate-Mex Vision Inc ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL INC ↗
- Who funds DYF ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FORTY-NINERS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP SUNNYVALE ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC HEARING CONNECTION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Horton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Horton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Horton Family’s filings →