Skip to content
Horace Mann School at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Horace Mann School

Horace Mann School prepares a diverse community of students to lead great and giving lives.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$155kRecreation & Sports$125kEducation$76kCivil Rights$55kHuman Services$45kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$10kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $116,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $16,007,662 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,891,662 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$541M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCE$35,000
PREP FOR PREP$25,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$20,000
MSK GIVING$10,000
RIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$10,000
SUMMER STEPS AT THE BRICK CHURCH SCHOOL$6,000
MUSIC FOR LIFE INSTITUTE$5,000
REHABILITATION THROUGH THE ARTS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $10k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 4 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$250k
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +101%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $55k · revenue 0%
  • PF
    PREP FOR PREP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue -32%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +42%
  • HC
    HILLTOP CARES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • RS
    RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Ideal School of Manhattan

An independent school providing a comprehensive educational program for children from K through 12th grade.

Education
2
Robert Louis Stevenson School

The robert louis stevenson school's mission is to provide a college preparatory program for bright adolescents who have not reached their potential in more traditional school settings. the program provides every student individually…

Education
3
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Ronald C Wornick Jewish Day School

Ronald c. wornick jewish day school develops students who are socially and academically prepared to meet their full potential as engaged leaders committed to a life steeped in jewish ethics and values.

—
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Mjhs Medical Associates Pc

The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to practice the profession of medicine for affiliates of metropolitan jewish health system, inc., which provide medical and health services.

Health
11
Young Men's & Young Women's Hebrew Association of the Bronx

The mission of the riverdale ym-ywha is to be the hub that brings together members of the jewish and wider community. at the ym-ywha, individuals and families of all backgrounds and abilities gather to grow, to learn, and to deepen their…

—
12
Riverdale Country School Inc

Riverdale country school is a pre-k through grade 12 independent school in new york city committed to empowering lifelong learners by developing minds, building character, and creating community in order to change our world for the good.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverdale Neighborhood House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riverdale Senior Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $150,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREV…VAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCE: $125,000 · Recreation & SportsVAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCEPREP FOR PREP: $50,300 · EducationPREP FOR PREPGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationGEORGE JACKSON …SUMMER ON THE HILL INC: $10,000 · EducationSUMMER ON THE H…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $55,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEW…HILLTOP CARES FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherHILLTOP CARES…THE BRICK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherTHE BRICK PRE…RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $10,000 · OtherRIVERDALE SEN…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $10,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOA…RIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementDANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureREHABILITATION THROUGH THE ARTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC FOR LIFE INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Crime & Legal$150,000Recreation & Sports$125,000Education$70,300Civil Rights$55,000Other$61,000Community Improvement$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $150,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetVAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCE: $125,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP: $50,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMER ON THE HILL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…The Achelis & Bodman …Pinkerton FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Pinkerton Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Horace Mann School funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Horace Mann School. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Horace Mann School’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home