Skip to content
Hope100 Incorporated at a glance

· Private foundation

Hope100 Incorporated

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$109kHuman Services$95kHousing & Shelter$62kFood & Nutrition$61kYouth Development$41kPublic Benefit$22kHealth$17kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greater Green Bay Habitat for Humanity$7,000
House of Hope$7,000
Pauls Pantry$7,000
Jackie Nitschke Center$7,000
Literacy Green Bay$7,000
Golden House$7,000
De Pere Christian Outreach$7,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters$7,000
St Johns Ministries$6,000
You Belong$5,000
Einstein Project$5,000
Freedom House$5,000
Cultivate Food Rescue$3,000
Ewing Sarcoma Institute$1,212
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Early Childhood Alliance: $5k → 12%A Mothers Hope: $5k → 12%De Pere Christian Outreach: $15k → 10%De Pere Christian Outreach: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 18 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -1% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
24

Total granted

$297k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
-6%

Still filing today

72%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    Communities in Schools
    3× · 2021–2024 · $70k
  • DP
    DE PERE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k · revenue 0%
  • GH
    GOLDEN HOUSE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $18k · revenue -16%

Funded once

  • GG
    Greater Green Bay Comm Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • NW
    North Webster Food Pantry
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • SF
    SYRACUSE FOOD PANTRY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

—
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Coralville Community Food Pantry

We believe that food is a human right and that food has the power to bring people together. Our vision is to build a stronger, healthier, and hunger-free Coralville community. Powered by community support, the Coralville Community Food…

Food & Nutrition
4
Shalom Center of Interfaith Network of Kenosha County Inc

Programs designed to serve the community's needs including a soup kitchen, family shelter, inns, food pantry, and other services.

Human Services
5
Food Bank of Northwest Indiana Inc

To provide food to various charitable organizations and needy individuals in northwest indiana.

Food & Nutrition
6
Interchurch Organization Inc

The mission of the henry hosea house is to provide food and nourishment for the bodies and souls of the men, women, and children of the northern kentucky/cincinnati area. we are a cooperative ecumenical nonprofit agency made up of…

Religion
7
East Bay Food Pantry

Providing hunger relief services in the east bay community.

Food & Nutrition
8
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
9
Christian Cupboard Emergency Food Shelf Dba Open Cupboard

Our mission is to provide nutritious food to our neighbors in a respectful manner while engaging our community in the fight against hunger.

—
10
Community Pantry

Provide emergency food, housing and utilities for people in need in the community

Human Services
11
Greater Lansing Food Bank

Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time, to create a future where everyone has access to nourishing food.

Food & Nutrition
12
Inter Parish Ministry Inc

Feeding families in need and connecting neighbors to life-enhancing resources.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Harvest Food Bank of Northeast Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cornerstone Christian Montessori. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
4/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Communities in Schools: $70,000 · OtherCommunities in SchoolsGreater Green Bay Comm Foundation: $22,000 · OtherGreater Green Bay Comm FoundationBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $18,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INCGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,000 · OtherGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYNorth Webster Food Pantry: $15,000 · OtherNorth Webster Food PantryYOU BELONG INC: $12,500 · OtherHouse of Hope: $12,000 · OtherCOMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES NETWORK INC: $11,500 · OtherCACCC: $11,000 · OtherFamily Promise: $10,250 · Other+14 more: $47,450 · Other+14 moreDE PERE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $21,500 · Human ServicesDE PERE CHRIS…GOLDEN HOUSE INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN HOUSE …EARLY CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesEARLY CHILDHO…A MOTHER'S HOPE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesA MOTHER'S HO…LITERACY GREEN BAY INC: $14,000 · EducationLITERACY G…EINSTEIN PROJECT INC: $13,500 · EducationEINSTEIN P…CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN MONTESSORI: $6,000 · EducationCORNERSTON…MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationMILLIKIN U…SYRACUSE FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $8,000 · Food & NutritionMiddlebury Food Pantry: $3,000 · Food & NutritionFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $13,500 · Housing & ShelterST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $9,000 · Housing & ShelterJACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC: $12,000 · HealthRIVER CITY ADVOCACY: $2,500 · HealthEWING SARCOMA INSTITUTE INC: $1,212 · HealthROSE GARDEN RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC: $1,000 · HealthNEW CITY KIDS INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $3,000 · Employment
Other$246,700Human Services$49,500Education$38,500Food & Nutrition$31,000Housing & Shelter$22,500Health$16,712Youth Development$15,000Employment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDE PERE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $21,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $18,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY GREEN BAY INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $13,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEINSTEIN PROJECT INC: $13,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES NETWORK INC: $11,500 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetSYRACUSE FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN MONTESSORI: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA MOTHER'S HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMILLIKIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMiddlebury Food Pantry: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRIVER CITY ADVOCACY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROSE GARDEN RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers Fou…Little Rapids Corpora…George Kress Foundati…John and Engrid Meng …Wisconsin Public Serv…Greater Green Bay Com…Maurice & June Robins…Joseph & Sarah Van Dr…K C Stock Foundation …De Pere Christian Out…Schneider National Fo…Madigan Family Founda…
Green Bay Packers FoundationWI22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Maurice & June Robinson Family Foundation Inc · Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust · K C Stock Foundation Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Madigan Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope100 Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope100 Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hope100’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home