Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hood Esther Gowen Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$217kHousing & Shelter$160kReligion$105kCrime & Legal$77kEmployment$40kYouth Development$40kCommunity Improvement$15k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY$40,000
DEPAUL USA INC$40,000
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE$40,000
BROAD STREET MINISTRY$30,000
HOPEPHL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $40k → 11%HOPEPHL: $10k → 22%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTER: $12k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $30k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY BM: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$267k · 4 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$267k
$297k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+58%

Still filing today

100%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalReligionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HOMELESS ADVOCACY PROJECT
    3× · 2020–2024 · $77k · revenue +26%
  • BP
    BETHESDA PROJECT
    2× · 2021–2023 · $70k · revenue +12%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY
    2× · 2022–2025 · $65k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SVC GREATER P
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • M
    MENZFITgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +244%
  • EC
    EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES ECS
    one grant, 2023 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peoples Properties Inc

Homeless

2
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
3
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
4
Urban Affairs Coalition

Driving change from the ground up, the urban affairs coalition (uac) unites government, business, neighborhoods, and individual initiatives to improve the quality of life in the region, build wealth in urban communities, and solve emerging…

5
First Light Inc

Offer those experiencing homelessness stable emergency shelter, access to housing programs, and the resources for them to achieve their full potential.

Human Services
6
1260 Housing Development Corporation

1260 housing development corporation is a not-for-profit corporation established for the purpose of developing, acquiring, financing, and managing low-income permanent housing for individuals with behavioral health issues, as well as…

Housing & Shelter
7
Family Promise of Philadelphia

To end family homelessness through direct aid, direct services, and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Committee for Dignity and Fairness for the Homeless Housing Development

Dignity Housing's mission is to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty that confronts low-income families and individuals in the City of Philadelphia.

9
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
10
Brooklyn Community Housing and Services

To provide short term, transitional and permanent housing, homelessness prevention, personalized case management, mental health care, on-site nursing, vocational training, substance abuse counseling, recreational activities and other vital…

Human Services
11
Faithful Servants Ministry

Housing the homeless

Human Services
12
Sunday Breakfast Rescue Mission

A living legacy of john wanamaker, philly house's mission is to open their doors every day with a welcoming spirit of christian compassion, walking alongside the homeless, hungry, and hurting of philadelphia so that they may experience the…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethesda Project and the most unlike its peers is Menzfit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY — $65,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETYJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SVC GREATER P — $50,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SVC GR…EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES ECS — $40,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES ECSLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY — $25,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETYNUEVA ESPERANZA INC — $15,000 · OtherNUEVA ESPERANZA INCBETHESDA PROJECT — $70,000 · Housing & ShelterBETHESDA PROJECTDEPAUL USA INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterDEPAUL USA INCACHIEVEABILITY — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterACHIEVEABILITYNUEVA ESPERANZA INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterNUEVA ESPERANZA INCPATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterPATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PABROAD STREET MINISTRY — $55,000 · Human ServicesBROAD STREET MINISTRYVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMIT…BROAD STREET MINISTRY CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesBROAD STREET MINISTRY CEN…NORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesNORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB IN…HOPEPHL — $10,000 · Human ServicesHOPEPHLHOMELESS ADVOCACY PROJECT — $77,000 · Crime & LegalHOMELESS ADVO…MENZFIT — $40,000 · EmploymentCHOSEN 300 MINISTRIES INC — $30,000 · Religion
Other$195,000Housing & Shelter$165,000Human Services$147,000Crime & Legal$77,000Employment$40,000Religion$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOMELESS ADVOCACY PROJECT — $77,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBETHESDA PROJECT — $70,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY — $65,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY — $55,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetACHIEVEABILITY — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY CENTER INC — $30,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCHOSEN 300 MINISTRIES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNUEVA ESPERANZA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetNORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB INC — $12,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOPEPHL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Beatty Helen D Groome Uw · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Elmer R Deaver Foundation Idt · Van Ameringen Foundation Inc · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Independence Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hood Esther Gowen Uw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Nueva Esperanza Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph