Skip to content

· Public charity

Honor Veterans Now

Meals for Vets mission is to reduce hunger in Texas Veteran population.

$101k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Food & Nutrition$481kHuman Services$47kHousing & Shelter$29k
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $62,627, the rows itemized in this filing. The $100,621 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,994 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$56,755
Median grant
2
States reached
$452k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOM'S MEALS$56,755
CHARTWELL DINING SERVICES$5,872
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF VICTORIA: $12k → 16%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $24k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $10k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $8k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$464k · 6 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$464k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+28%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $47k · revenue +68%
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $37k · revenue +36%
  • MO
    Meals on Wheels Plus Incorporated
    4× · 2017–2020 · $32k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IM
    Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houstongraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +169%
  • ER
    Evelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • SC
    Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels Ministry Inc

Empowers older and disabled adults to live independentlly in thier own homes by providing nutritious home-delivered meals, safety checks, socialization, and community connection, which result in an enhanced quality of life and purpose as…

Food & Nutrition
2
Meals On Wheels South Texas

Provide nutrition, transportation, and other services that support independent living for seniors, including the operation of a senior citizens center, meals on wheels, and transportation services within victoria and the surrounding…

Food & Nutrition
3
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
4
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
5
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
6
Meals On Wheels and More Inc

Delivering care that empowers our neighbors by promoting dignity and independence.

Food & Nutrition
7
Fort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and Much Much More

See Schedule OFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels provides comprehensive services, including Meals on Wheels, congregate meals, transportation, case management, health screenings, information and referral services, recreation, and more. Our…

Human Services
8
Meals On Wheels Collin County

Our mission is to combat hunger and isolation in disabled and older adults by providing nutritious meals enabling them to remain healthy and independent within their families, homes, and communities.

Human Services
9
Meals On Wheels Senior Services

To keep the elderly and disabled citizens of Rockwall County living in their homes as long as safely possible through supportive services, nutritious meals, and daily human contact.

Human Services
10
Meals On Wheels Inc

Provide meal delivery service to seniors and adult day program participants.

Food & Nutrition
11
Eastside Meals on Wheels Inc

To deliver nutritious meals to homebound persons in Northeast Minneapolis, St. Anthony Village and Southeast Minneapolis. Approximatly 178 meals a day, five days a week are served.

Food & Nutrition
12
Meals On Wheels - Walker Countytx Inc

The center functions to serve senior adults 60 yrs and older. provide programs and services that will enable the individuals to be an integral part of the community and allow them to retain independence dignity and sense of well being

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels San Antonio; the most unlike its peers is Evelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOM'S MEALS - PUR FOODS LLC: $306,239 · OtherMOM'S MEALS - PUR FOODS LLCInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $20,313 · OtherInterfaith Ministries for Greater HoustonCITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI: $12,969 · Other+3 more: $17,700 · OtherANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $47,040 · Human ServicesANOTHER CHANCE…Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana: $13,940 · Human ServicesSenior Citizen…COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF VICTORIA TEXAS: $12,345 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTI…Meals on Wheels Plus Incorporated: $31,562 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $9,090 · Food & NutritionVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $36,814 · HealthTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $29,381 · Housing & ShelterEvelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston: $20,289 · Religion
Other$357,221Human Services$73,325Food & Nutrition$40,652Health$36,814Housing & Shelter$29,381Religion$20,289

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $47,040 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $36,814 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $29,381 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $20,313 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEvelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston: $20,289 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSenior Citizens Services of Texarkana: $13,940 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $9,090 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBANDERA COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING: $6,332 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO: $5,496 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meals on Wheels AmericaVA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meals on Wheels America · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Honor Veterans Now funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Honor Veterans Now. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Honor Veterans Now?

    Find your warmest path to Honor Veterans Now through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Honor Veterans Now’s filings →

    More from the funding graph