Skip to content

· Private foundation

Honey Rock Endtime Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$933k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$3.8MReligion$1.1MHuman Services$535kCrime & Legal$241kHealth$158kEducation$73kRecreation & Sports$41kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $750k
$22,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND$200,000
CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL -MALAWI$150,000
PROJECT RED FOUNDATION- EL SALVADOR$140,000
DESTINO DEL REINO - HONDURAS$100,000
GRACE ADVENTURES$60,000
THE JUSTICE FOUNDATION$50,000
NEW ORLEANS MISSION LYNHAVEN RETREA$50,000
INDIGENOUS REFUGE$30,000
LIFE SAVERS OF ZAMBIA$22,000
INNER FAITH PRISON MINISTRY$20,750
KUDVUMISA FOUNDATION USA INC$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
LIFE RESOURCES$20,000
METANOIA$20,000
SAVEZONE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FINISHING THE WORK: $10k → 11%FINISHING THE WORK: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OR
NV
PA
CA
MO
NM
TN
LA
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Honey Rock Endtime Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 38% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 99%.

Honey Rock Endtime Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 39 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
6

Total granted

$6.3M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+9%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionCrime & LegalEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    Child Legacy International Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $942k · revenue +9%
  • GA
    GRACE ADVENTURES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $330k · revenue +25% · 26% of their budget
  • LR
    LIFE RESOURCES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $140k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTHLAKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +9%
  • AT
    ANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -6%
  • NC
    NW COLLEGIATE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Living Faith

Missionary work, seminars and meetings

Religion
2
Caring Counseling Ministries

Biblical family counseling

Human Services
3
Lifetouch Ministries Inc

To provide counseling, professional teaching, small group ministry and prayer ministry to all who seek it.

Religion
4
Discovery Counseling & Life Planning

Biblical counseling church leadership

Human Services
5
Living Waters Ministries Inc

To operate youth camps under the entities' religious principles.

Recreation & Sports
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
8
Christlife Ministries

Christlife ministries is a non-denominational program dedicated to the discipleship & restoration of ex-offenders, their families, & the imprisoned. mission begins with turning hearts, minds, and souls of parents to their children and…

Crime & Legal
9
Gull Lake Ministries

Gull lake ministries provides bible based, christian retreats year-round for families, churches and organizations where we exalt jesus and share his truth.

Religion
10
Christian Life Ministries

Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…

Human Services
11
Divine Romance Ministries

Divine Romance Ministries Inc provides Christ-centered mentoringcoaching Our goal is to strengthen christian marriages in an effort to eliminate divorce The focus of our message is a complete and total submission to the Lord Jesus Christ 1…

Religion
12
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Adventures Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nw Collegiate Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $1,258,547 · ReligionSHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INCChild Legacy International Inc: $942,000 · ReligionChild Legacy International IncGRACE ADVENTURES INC: $330,000 · ReligionGRACE ADVENTURES INCLIFE RESOURCES INC: $140,000 · Religion+3 more: $79,550 · ReligionPROJECT RED FOUNDATION- EL SALVADOR: $795,000 · OtherPROJECT RED FOUNDATION- EL SALVADORDESTINO DEL REINO - HONDURAS: $705,000 · OtherDESTINO DEL REINO - HONDURASNEW ORLEANS MISSION LYNHAVEN RETREA: $230,000 · OtherNEW ORLEANS MISSION LYNHAVEN RETREALIFE SAVERS OF ZAMBIA: $112,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · Other+26 more: $832,775 · Other+26 moreTHE RETREAT HOME FOR CHILDREN: $365,000 · Crime & LegalINNERFAITH PRISON MINISTRY INC: $92,750 · Crime & LegalTHE JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $148,000 · PhilanthropyKUDVUMISA FOUNDATION USA INC: $110,000 · InternationalFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY: $67,000 · EducationNW COLLEGIATE MINISTRIES: $5,000 · EducationUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $32,500 · HealthCOMPASSION THAT COMPELS: $15,000 · Health
Religion$2,750,097Other$2,779,775Crime & Legal$457,750Philanthropy$148,000International$110,000Education$72,000Health$47,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $1,258,547 over 6y, 29% of budgetChild Legacy International Inc: $942,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetTHE RETREAT HOME FOR CHILDREN: $365,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetGRACE ADVENTURES INC: $330,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetTHE JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $148,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetLIFE RESOURCES INC: $140,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetKUDVUMISA FOUNDATION USA INC: $110,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetINNERFAITH PRISON MINISTRY INC: $92,750 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY: $67,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTIKVAT AM YISRAEL INC: $51,550 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $41,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMETANOIA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $32,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetLOUISIANA FAMILY FORUM INC: $32,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetDISCIPLESHIP NETWORK OF AMERICA: $23,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFINISHING THE WORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetCOMPASSION THAT COMPELS: $15,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetNORTHLAKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $6,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNW COLLEGIATE MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP LIVING WATERS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Legacy International Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE RETREAT HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GRACE ADVENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFE RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds KUDVUMISA FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds INNERFAITH PRISON MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH CAMP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TIKVAT AM YISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds METANOIA INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA FAMILY FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FINISHING THE WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION THAT COMPELS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Honey Rock Endtime Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Honey Rock Endtime Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Honey Rock Endtime Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Honey Rock Endtime Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Honey Rock Endtime’s filings →

    More from the funding graph