Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Homeless Assistance Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$285k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Human Services$345kHousing & Shelter$335kHealth$110kCivil Rights$105kYouth Development$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER$50,000
JUNTOS$45,000
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE$45,000
FEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS$30,000
WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE$25,000
WOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PR$25,000
FIRST STEP STAFFING$25,000
PATHWAYS TO HOUSING PA$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $45k → 11%DRUEDING CENTER: $35k → 22%GENDER JUSTICE FUND: $30k → 22%GENDER JUSTICE FUND: $30k → 22%JUNTOS: $45k → 22%PEOPLE'S EMERGENCY CENTER: $35k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $50k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $30k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $30k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$600k · 8 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$600k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-1%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEmploymentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $135k · revenue +9%
  • NS
    NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $110k · revenue +15%
  • MC
    MAZZONI CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +216%

Funded once

  • VY
    VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • AI
    ActionAids Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -1%
  • DC
    DRUEDING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
2
Urban Affairs Coalition

Driving change from the ground up, the urban affairs coalition (uac) unites government, business, neighborhoods, and individual initiatives to improve the quality of life in the region, build wealth in urban communities, and solve emerging…

3
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
4
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
5
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
6
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
7
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
8
Places of Change

Resource for housing and other essential needs

Housing & Shelter
9
Moving Forward Network

Our mission is to provide free philadelphia transitional housing and support services to homeless populations to facilitate their movement to long-term housing.

Housing & Shelter
10
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

11
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
12
Covenant House New Jersey Inc

To provide shelter, food, medical and mental health care, legal services, educational and vocational services and an array of housing options, including transitional and permanent housing opportunities, for youth facing homelessness and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hopephl and the most unlike its peers is Gender Justice Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INCNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA — $110,000 · Human ServicesNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIAGender Justice Fund — $60,000 · Human ServicesGender Justice FundVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INCJUNTOS — $45,000 · Human ServicesJUNTOSDRUEDING CENTER — $35,000 · Human ServicesDRUEDING CENTERHOPEPHL — $35,000 · Human ServicesHOPEPHLMAZZONI CENTER — $60,000 · OtherMAZZONI CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PR — $55,000 · OtherWOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZA…VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE — $50,000 · OtherVALLEY YOUTH HOUSEIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSELF INC — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterSELF INCWOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterWOMEN'S COMM…PATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterPATHWAYS TO …First Step Staffing Inc — $60,000 · EmploymentActionAids Inc — $50,000 · HealthFEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS — $30,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$465,000Other$245,000Housing & Shelter$110,000Employment$60,000Health$50,000Youth Development$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC — $135,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA — $110,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAZZONI CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSELF INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGender Justice Fund — $60,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetFirst Step Staffing Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetActionAids Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDRUEDING CENTER — $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOPEPHL — $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Union Benevolent Association · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Connelly Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Homeless Assistance Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Homeless Assistance Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Homeless Assistance Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph