Skip to content
Holland & Knight Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Holland & Knight Charitable Foundation

The Holland & Knight Charitable Foundation is a public charity created to manage and coordinate the charitable contributions and activities of Holland & Knight LLP, its partners and its employees.

$483k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$275kEducation$239kHealth$146kArts & Culture$96kHuman Services$76kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kHousing & Shelter$30kEmployment$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $167,091, the rows itemized in this filing. The $483,165 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $316,074 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $130k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Red Cross$33,485
Booker T Washington School of Arts$30,000
American Lung Association$20,000
APK Charities$13,053
House of Heroes$13,053
Stageworks Theatre$10,000
Dallas Eviction Advocacy Center$10,000
Highland Park Sports Club$8,000
Scottish Rite for Children$8,000
American Cancer Society$7,500
Hereditary Angioedema Assoc$7,500
Dallas Symphony Orchestra Association$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND: $11k → 10%American Red Cross: $33k → 9%COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$455k · 9 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$455k
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+14%

Still filing today

89%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEmploymentHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    2× · 2019–2021 · $127k · revenue +67%
  • AC
    APK CHARITIES CORPORATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $35k · revenue +368% · 45% of their budget
  • HO
    House of Heroes Connecticut Chapter Inc
    4× · 2019–2024 · $35k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -45%
  • AS
    AUSTIN STREET CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -40%
  • HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
2
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
3
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
5
The Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas

Using Shakespeare's works as a cornerstone, Shakespeare Dallas serves the Southwest region with fun and accessible indoor and outdoor theatre, integrated school programs, and cultural enrichment for people of all ages and backgrounds.

—
6
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
7
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
8
Dallas Bar Association

The Dallas Bar Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered by the State of Texas to protect and advance the professional interests of persons licensed to practice law in the Dallas area, to improve the relations between the Bench, the…

—
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Parkinson's Body and Mind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $240,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BA…UNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY MIAMI INC+1 more: $6,850 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Miami: $127,050 · EducationUniversity of MiamiTHE ADVISORY BOARD OF BOOKER T WASHINGTON HS FOR PERFORMING &: $75,000 · EducationTHE ADVISORY BOARD OF BOOK…Small Steps Nurturing Center: $18,500 · EducationSmall Steps Nurturing Cent…HIGHLAND PARK SPORTS CLUB: $8,000 · EducationAmerican Lung Association Of The Upper Midwest: $102,500 · OtherAmerican Lung Association Of…House of Heroes Connecticut Chapter Inc: $34,720 · OtherHouse of Heroes Connecticut …AUSTIN STREET CENTER: $30,000 · OtherAUSTIN STREET CENTERTESSITURA NETWORK INC: $9,000 · OtherGoodwill Industries of Dallas Inc: $20,000 · OtherGoodwill Industries of Dalla…COFFEE FOR GOOD INC: $10,000 · OtherHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $10,000 · OtherDALLAS EVICTION ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $20,200 · Other+3 moreFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF…DALLAS THEATER CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS THE…STAGEWORKS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSTAGEWORKS…DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYM…NORTH TEXAS BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS DBA BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $5,300 · Arts & CultureNORTH TEXA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $33,485 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $18,000 · Human ServicesPARKINSON'S BODY AND MIND INC: $10,000 · HealthSISTEMA INFANTIL TELETON USA: $10,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $8,000 · HealthHEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMA ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 · HealthAPK CHARITIES CORPORATION: $34,720 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$281,850Education$228,550Other$246,420Arts & Culture$86,800Human Services$51,485Health$43,000Public Benefit$34,720

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $240,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $127,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADVISORY BOARD OF BOOKER T WASHINGTON HS FOR PERFORMING &: $75,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPK CHARITIES CORPORATION: $34,720 over 4y, 45% of budgetHouse of Heroes Connecticut Chapter Inc: $34,720 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $33,485 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGoodwill Industries of Dallas Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center: $18,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $18,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetSTAGEWORKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS EVICTION ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOFFEE FOR GOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPARKINSON'S BODY AND MIND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSISTEMA INFANTIL TELETON USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTESSITURA NETWORK INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK SPORTS CLUB: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMA ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT: $7,350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $6,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS DBA BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $5,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thompson & Knight Fou…Texas Instruments Fou…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Thompson & Knight FoundationTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thompson & Knight Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holland & Knight Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holland & Knight Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • United Way Miami Inc: 23% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Holland & Knight’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home