Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hochwarth Schonfeld Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$24kCivil Rights$20kYouth Development$15kReligion$15kHousing & Shelter$11kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
KENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION$2,000
MARYLAND FOOD BANK$1,500
HAFIZABAD RELIEF FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PICKERSGILL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $4k → 11%PICKERSGILL: $450 → 11%MARIAN HOUSE: $5k → 19%MARIAN HOUSE: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 10 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$95k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+15%

Still filing today

70%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $22k · revenue +38%
  • HI
    HOPE IGNITES BALTIMORE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +7%
  • MH
    MARIAN HOUSE INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BALTIMORE WOMEN'S GIVING CIRCLE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • MH
    Magnificat Houses Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +160%
  • MH
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
2
Maryland Inclusive Housing Corporation

Maryland inclusive housing corporation's (mih) mission is to help people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities (idd) successfully access and maintain inclusive, affordable, and accessible housing of their choice by…

Housing & Shelter
3
Manna House Inc

To offer assistance and support to the homeless, poor and needy of baltimore with services contributing toward their independence and stability.

—
4
Meals On Wheels of Central Marylandinc

Meals on wheels of central maryland's charitable mission, to keep homebound people living safely and independently at home through the provision of nutritious meals, personal contact and support services, reduces hospitalization, and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

—
6
Maryland New Directions Inc

Maryland new directions' mission is to train and coach people facing career and life transitions to overcome barriers, restore self-belief, and acquire the skills and tools needed to secure employment on a path to a living wage.

Health
7
Mentoring Mentors Inc

Mentoring Mentors is a Baltimore-based non-profit dedicated to developing future community leaders through exposure that leads to college and career readiness.

Youth Development
8
Goodwill Mennonite Home Inc

Goodwill mennonite home provides a continuum of care offering independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing, and memory care services. goodwill mennonite home's mission is to serve individuals withy dignity and respect, supporting…

Employment
9
Nourishing Bethesda Inc

Fighting food insecurity in our area by providing nutritious food and community support to our neighbors in need, as well as offering and linking our clients to wraparound resources that will enable them to build healthy and stable lives.

Human Services
10
House of the Good Shepherd of the City of Baltimore

Good Shepherd Services closed its residential treatment facility in March 2017. No new mission has been established at this time.

Health
11
Adopt a Block Inc

Adopt a block operates a food distribution program that supports soup kitchens and food pantries in the baltimore metropolitan area, and sponsors a community revitalization program that benefits baltimore city neighborhoods.

—
12
Housing Unlimited Inc

Housing unlimited, inc. is a non-profit dedicated to providing affordable, permanent housing opportunities and independent living for adults in mental health recovery.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paul's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mindful Mentors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $21,500 · OtherTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INCHOUSE OF RUTH: $15,000 · OtherHOUSE OF RUTHHOPE IGNITES BALTIMORE INC: $15,000 · OtherHOPE IGNITES BALTIMORE INCHAFIZABAD RELIEF FUND: $4,000 · OtherHAFIZABAD RELIEF FUNDTHE BALTIMORE WOMEN'S GIVING CIRCLE: $2,500 · Other+4 more: $2,850 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGU…MARIAN HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMARIAN HOUSE IN…PICKERSGILL INC: $4,450 · Human ServicesPICKERSGILL INCBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,685 · PhilanthropyKENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDLY LOVING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels Delaware Inc: $200 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $65 · Food & NutritionMagnificat Houses Inc: $1,000 · HealthMARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$60,850Civil Rights$20,000Human Services$14,450Philanthropy$7,685Food & Nutrition$2,265Health$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $21,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IGNITES BALTIMORE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMARIAN HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,685 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPICKERSGILL INC: $4,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDLY LOVING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMagnificat Houses Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMindful Mentors Inc: $700 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels Delaware Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PLACE INC: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hochwarth Schonfeld Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hochwarth Schonfeld Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Paul's Place Inc: 29% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Maryland Historical Society Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Marian House Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hochwarth Schonfeld Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hochwarth Schonfeld Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hochwarth Schonfeld’s filings →

More from the funding graph