· Private foundation
Hobbs Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $265k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC | $50,000 |
| HEALTHTREE FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| ST JOHNS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING | $25,000 |
| JUDIS HOUSE | $25,000 |
| SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES | $25,000 |
| COLORADO SPRINGS ALL BREED RESCUE | $25,000 |
| KHAN ACADEMY INC | $25,000 |
| SEAMARK RANCH INC | $25,000 |
| THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $15,000 |
| TIP OF THE SPEAR FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE | $15,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION | $10,000 |
| THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SRSEAMARK RANCH INC6× · 2019–2024 · $245k · revenue +9%
- BABoys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $195k · revenue +137%
- JHJUDI'S HOUSE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $165k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- ABAll Breed Rescueone grant, 2019 · $15k
- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -18%
- MCMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +101%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…
Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…
Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.
To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.
Organization - kids beating cancer, inc., (kbc) is a nonprofit, nonstock florida corporation formed in 1992. kbc provides access to life-saving treatments through the science of cellular therapy and advancing pediatric innovative, novel,…
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the British Columbia Cancer Foundation Us. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEAMARK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HealthTree Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS ALL BREED RESCUE ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds St Johns County Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds TIP OF THE SPEAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Coastal Prairie Conservancy ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LEASHES OF VALOR ↗
- Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds METRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN CIVIC SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds ANGELS' PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
- Who funds ST JOHNS COUNTY CULTURAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds The Magic Yarn Project ↗
- Who funds MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANGELS' PLACE ↗
- Who funds Home Again St Johns Inc ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOR A DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPICE OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds Friends of the British Columbia Cancer Foundation US ↗
- Who funds BEACHES FINE ARTS SERIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Shell USA Company Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hobbs Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- St Johns County Cultural Council — 39% of income from government
- Home Again St Johns Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hobbs Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hobbs Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.