Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hixon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
67
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$936kArts & Culture$198kAnimals$87kHealth$68kPublic Benefit$42kEducation$24kRecreation & Sports$23kPhilanthropy$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k64 grants · $141k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 98% of reported assets are held in Stocks Wells Fargo.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAST CHANCE FOREVER BIRD OF PREY$15,000
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION$10,500
GEAA (Greater Edwards Acquifer)$10,000
THE CONSERVATION FUND$5,282
GEAA (Greater Edwards Acquifer)$5,050
TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND$5,000
SAVE OUR SPRINGS ALLIANCE$5,000
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO$4,130
SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDENS$3,500
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,099
BIG BEND CONSERVANCY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HONOR FLIGHT INC: $100 → 15%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $275 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $275 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $275 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $258 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%YMCA OF AUSTIN: $500 → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%THRIVE YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 16%THRIVE YOUTH CENTER: $1k → 16%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $1k → 16%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 95 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

95 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
46

Total granted

$1.4M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+23%

Still filing today

60%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GREATER EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $239k · revenue +179%
  • NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +51%
  • PH
    PHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $57k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • BN
    BB NPCA NATIONAL PARKS CONSERV ASSOC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k
  • LC
    LAST CHANCE FOREVER-BIRD OF PREY CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
2
Coastal Prairie Conservancy

The Coastal Prairie Conservancy (CPC) works to sustain a resilient Texas by preserving coastal prairies, wetlands, farms, and ranches to benefit people and wildlife forever. Continued on Schedule OCPC conserves land, restores and enhances…

Environment
3
Bexar Land Trust Inc dba Green Spaces Alliance of South Texas

The mission of Bexar Land Trust (Green Spaces) is to sustain the natural environment and enhance urban spaces through land conservation, community engagement, and education.

Environment
4
Guadalupe River Park Conservancy

Guadalupe River Park Conservancy provides community leadership for the development and active use of Guadalupe River Park & Garden through education, advocacy and stewardship.

Environment
5
Trinity Park Conservancy

Trinity Park Conservancy champions the transformation of the Trinity River to become the heart of Dallas. With the community, the Conservancy will design public spaces that unite us, enrich people's lives through access to nature, create…

Community Improvement
6
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
7
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
8
Shoal Creek Conservancy

The conservancy is dedicated to restoring, protecting and enhancing the ecological, social and cultural vibrancy of shoal creek in austin, texas, for the people of austin by engaging the public and partnering with the community, including…

Environment
9
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
10
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
11
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
12
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio River Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bamberger Ranch Preserve. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/81
Grantees still filing
61/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE: $238,773 · EnvironmentGREATER EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCENATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $71,254 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATIONTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $36,782 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATIO…Save Our Springs Alliance Inc: $32,149 · EnvironmentSave Our Springs Alliance IncOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $24,250 · Environment+19 more: $183,847 · Environment+19 moreGEAA (Greater Edwards Acquifer): $53,550 · OtherGEAA (Greater Edwards Acquifer)LAST CHANCE FOREVER-THE BIRD OF PREY CONSERVANCY: $50,000 · OtherLAST CHANCE FOREVER-THE BIRD OF PREY CONS…LAST CHANCE FOREVER BIRD OF PREY: $30,000 · OtherLAST CHANCE FOREVER BIRD OF PREYNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $22,420 · Other+101 more: $396,917 · Other+101 moreWitte Museum: $120,275 · Arts & CultureWitte MuseumTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO: $53,550 · Arts & CultureTEXAS PUBLIC R…+7 more: $12,728 · Arts & Culture+7 morePHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY: $57,420 · Recreation & SportsBrackenridge Park Conservancy: $13,529 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $50 · Recreation & SportsPlanned Parenthood South Texas: $42,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10,000 · HealthTriple H Equitherapy Center: $2,300 · Health+1 more: $523 · HealthTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND: $35,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $1,380 · Civil Rights+1 more: $500 · Civil RightsALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · EducationWimberley Valley Watershed Association: $6,030 · EducationTrinity University: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $250 · Education
Environment$587,055Other$552,887Arts & Culture$186,553Recreation & Sports$70,999Health$54,823Civil Rights$36,880Education$17,780

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE: $238,773 over 8y, 11% of budgetWitte Museum: $120,275 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $71,254 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY: $57,420 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO: $53,550 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPlanned Parenthood South Texas: $42,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $36,782 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSave Our Springs Alliance Inc: $32,149 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $24,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $22,420 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $18,479 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSan Marcos River Foundation: $16,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetTHE GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT INC (AUDIT): $14,590 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE INC: $14,099 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $13,560 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBrackenridge Park Conservancy: $13,529 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $13,357 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHill Country Alliance: $13,140 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK: $13,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $12,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHeadwaters at Incarnate Word Inc: $12,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PARKS FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFUND TEXAS CHOICE: $10,075 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $9,192 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE BARTON CREEK ASSOCIATION: $8,060 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTEXAS LAND TRUST COUNCIL: $8,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS WATER TRADE: $7,022 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE YOUTH CENTER INC: $6,180 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWimberley Valley Watershed Association: $6,030 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEADWATERS AT THE COMAL: $5,089 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBamberger Ranch Preserve: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $3,708 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBexar County Family Justice Center Foundation: $3,030 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER EDWARDS AQUIFER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood South Texas ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Save Our Springs Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Marcos River Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT INC (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds COMAL COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Hill Country Alliance ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Headwaters at Incarnate Word Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FUND TEXAS CHOICE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX49.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Smothers and Bud Smothers Memorial Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation · 80-20 Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hixon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hixon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hixon Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hixon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hixon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph