· Private foundation
Hitchcock Margaret M Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k93 grants · $188k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $216k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $46,333 |
| NEW YORK HOSPITAL | $35,000 |
| NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART | $30,000 |
| Tanzanian Children's Fund | $27,000 |
| Lyford Cay Foundation Inc | $20,000 |
| BANTHOONGPRAO SCHOOL | $17,500 |
| PITTSBURGH MUSKOKA FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| GREEN EARTH FOUNDATION | $14,500 |
| H pital Albert Schweitzer Haiti | $10,000 |
| THE GRANT FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| HITCHCOCK FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| BE PRESENT NOW INC | $6,000 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| THE EAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Mary and Alexander Laughlin Childrens Ce | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PITTSBURGHMUSKOKA FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $17k · revenue +23%
- UPUNITED PLANT SAVERS2× · 2020–2021 · $16k · revenue +440%
- AFARIZONA FRIENDS OF TIBET2× · 2020–2021 · $11k · revenue +2% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- ATALLEY THEATREgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +118%
- HGHouston Grand Opera Association Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +42%
- UZUPAYA ZEN CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
The Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies (FAPE) is dedicated to enhancing the United States' image abroad through American Art. Founded as a public-private, non-partisan partnership in 1986, FAPE works with the U.S. Department…
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Hanley Foundation Co Sue Hanley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
- Who funds LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PITTSBURGHMUSKOKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED PLANT SAVERS ↗
- Who funds GREEN EARTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAPOEIRA ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLEY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds Hitchcock Foundation ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA FRIENDS OF TIBET ↗
- Who funds EAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARY & ALEXANDER LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds GRANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TIBET HOUSE US INC ↗
- Who funds Houston Grand Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Lenox Hill Hospital ↗
- Who funds THE LYFORD CAY CLUB CHARITABLE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
- Who funds National Museum of Polo & Hall of Fame ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT ↗
- Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds MALA'AI ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN JAGUAR PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hitchcock Bowart Daterra Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The New York Community Trust · George L Ohrstrom Foundation · Frances Gilmore Scaife Private Foundation · The Shana Alexander Charitable Foundation · The Daniel and Estrellita Brodsky Family Foundation · The Pamela Howard Family Foundation Inc · The Brown Foundation Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Hillman Family Foundations
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hitchcock Margaret M Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jerusalem Peacebuilders Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art Inc — 4% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.