· Private foundation
Hilltop Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $671k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $313k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSP | $60,000 |
| NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE | $52,500 |
| IN THE WAITING | $50,000 |
| UNITED METHODIST MEMORIAL HOME | $50,000 |
| FAITH COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION | $50,000 |
| FRESNO CHAFFEE ZOO | $50,000 |
| VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE | $35,000 |
| NORTHERN NEVADA HOPES | $30,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $28,498 |
| AGAPE CHURCH SLO | $25,000 |
| WARREN INC | $25,000 |
| BILL WILSON CENTER | $25,000 |
| SIERRA MONO MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| PAHRUMP SENIOR CENTER | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $256k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $482k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VHVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +138%
- FCFAITH COMMUNICATIONS CORP3× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +8%
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- HSHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support and care for the terminally ill, families, and others through all phases of an illness so that they may live as fully and as…
To help families with children and individuals achieve self-reliance
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…
NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.
Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.
We are a team of professionals striving to prepare our patients and families for the end of life experience. we support the patient, family, and friends in facing challenges of a life limiting illness by offering physical, emotional, and…
To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.
The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Santa Cruz County and the most unlike its peers is Never Forgotten Animal Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) ↗
- Who funds FAITH COMMUNICATIONS CORP ↗
- Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services ↗
- Who funds Fresnos Chaffee Zoo Corporation ↗
- Who funds United Methodist Memorial Home ↗
- Who funds BILL WILSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds PAHRUMP SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds Sierra Mono Museum ↗
- Who funds Veterans Guest House Inc ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Trauma Intervention Programs Inc ↗
- Who funds ABODE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FRESNO IDEAWORKS ↗
- Who funds Poverello House ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CHILDREN'S TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · Sosj Knights Hospitaller Priory of the Western USA · The Skip Viragh Foundation Inc · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Tahoe Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hilltop Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.