Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hillswood Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$169k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$928kYouth Development$340kArts & Culture$287kHealth$103kFood & Nutrition$90kInternational$83kPhilanthropy$41kEmployment$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $162k
$17,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY$34,300
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES$27,000
INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$17,000
BEYOND OUR DOOR$17,000
TIMBER BAY - YOUTH INVESTMENT FDN$17,000
SUNVALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY MUSIC FESTIVAL$12,500
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$12,000
BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIMBER BAY - YOUTH INVESTMENT FDN: $18k → 11%TIMBER BAY - YOUTH INVESTMENT FDN: $17k → 11%TIMBER BAY - YOUTH INVESTMENT FDN: $15k → 11%TIMBER BAY - YOUTH INVESTMENT FDN: $15k → 11%TIMBER BAY - YOUTH INVESTMENT FDN: $10k → 11%YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 13 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -74% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$1.9M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-74%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DePauw University
    7× · 2018–2024 · $928k · revenue +31%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $253k · revenue +49%
  • IH
    INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $204k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • NM
    NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • KC
    KETCHUM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota State College Southeast Foundation

Minnesota state college southeast foundation assists the college in achieving excellence in technical education for employment by developing financial and community resources for students, employers, and communities within our service area.

Education
2
Minnesota Chamber Foundation

The organization's mission is to bring stakeholders together to promote prosperity and long-term growth of minnesota's economy.

Public Benefit
3
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
4
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
5
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
6
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
11
Summit Academy Oic

To assist individuals in developing their ability to earn and become contributing citizens in their community. we support the development of self sufficiency in every person regardless of background, economic status, or level of ability.…

Education
12
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DePauw University: $928,050 · EducationDePauw UniversityBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES: $253,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS…INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $203,750 · Arts & CultureINDIANA HISTO…SUN VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSUN VALLEY FI…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $90,175 · InternationalFEED MY ST…BEYOND OUR DOOR: $53,000 · InternationalBEYOND OUR…BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $29,500 · InternationalBOOKS FOR …NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $92,775 · HealthYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $87,275 · Human ServicesSUNVALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $52,775 · OtherSUNVALLEY …NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: $10,000 · OtherMICROGRANTS: $41,000 · OtherMICROGRANT…Twin Cities Rise: $40,500 · OtherTwin Citie…JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $39,000 · OtherJEREMIAH P…+1 more: $5,000 · Other
Education$928,050Youth Development$253,000Arts & Culture$233,750International$172,675Health$92,775Human Services$87,275Other$188,275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDePauw University: $928,050 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES: $253,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetINDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $203,750 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $92,775 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $90,175 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $87,275 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBEYOND OUR DOOR: $53,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMICROGRANTS: $41,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTwin Cities Rise: $40,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $39,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSUN VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $29,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKETCHUM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DePauw University ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND OUR DOOR ↗
  • Who funds MICROGRANTS ↗
  • Who funds Twin Cities Rise ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds KETCHUM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hillswood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hillswood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hillswood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph