Skip to content
Hilliard Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Hilliard Family Foundation Inc

Hilliard family foundation, inc.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$66kYouth Development$36kEducation$35kPhilanthropy$32kHuman Services$24kRecreation & Sports$17kHealth$16kReligion$15k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $5,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $85,050 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $79,550 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPIRO INC$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Greater Green Bay YMCA Inc: $10k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $9k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$209k · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$209k
$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +59%
  • FH
    FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +17%
  • EP
    ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +60%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

    We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

    Public Benefit
    2
    Downtown Green Bay Inc

    Dgbi works to revitalize the social and economic climate of downtown green bay.

    Youth Development
    3
    Boys & Girls Clubs of the Sioux Empire

    To nurture, educate and enrich children and youth for life-long success.

    Human Services
    4
    Bay-Lakes Council #635 Boy Scouts of America

    To instill in young people; values, develop leadership skills, and ethical character as expressed in the scout oath and law.

    Youth Development
    5
    Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

    Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

    —
    6
    Ywca Great Lakes Bay Region

    The ywca great lakes bay region is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

    Human Services
    7
    House of Hope Green Bay Inc

    House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

    —
    8
    Greater Green Bay Chamber of Commerce Inc

    To strengthen member businesses, enhance economic and workforce development, and improve the quality of life in our community and region.

    —
    9
    Nexus Youth and Families

    Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…

    Human Services
    10
    Southeastern Wisconsin Youth for Christ Inc

    Southeastern wisconsin youth for christ works towards reaching young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle,…

    —
    11
    Winona Family Ymca Inc

    The winona family ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families and strong…

    —
    12
    Boys and Girls Clubs of Indianapolis Inc

    Bgci believes that every young person deserves to live a life filled with hope and opportunity. because we care about our young people, we provide a safe, educational, and positive atmosphere where they can prosper and reach their full…

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Daniel Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $35,500 · Housing & ShelterFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INCECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOU…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $36,352 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $35,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEME…GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $31,700 · PhilanthropyGREATER GREEN …GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $24,200 · Human ServicesGREATER GRE…Camp Daniel Inc: $16,500 · Recreation & SportsASPIRO INC: $16,000 · EducationTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $15,000 · Other
    Housing & Shelter$65,500Youth Development$36,352International$35,000Philanthropy$31,700Human Services$24,200Recreation & Sports$16,500Education$16,000Other$15,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $36,352 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $35,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $31,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $24,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Daniel Inc: $16,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetASPIRO INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    De Pere Christian Out…John and Engrid Meng …George Kress Foundati…Wisconsin Public Serv…Green Bay Packers Fou…Cornerstone Foundatio…Schreiber Foods Found…Baird Foundation IncElizabeth B and Phili…Bernard E and Alyce G…Maurice & June Robins…Joseph & Sarah Van Dr…
    De Pere Christian OutreachWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: De Pere Christian Outreach · John and Engrid Meng Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd · Bernard E and Alyce G Dahlin Foundation Inc · Maurice & June Robinson Family Foundation Inc · Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Hilliard Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hilliard Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Hilliard Family Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Hilliard Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Hilliard Family’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home