Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

High Poplars Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$370k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$649kEducation$498kCommunity Improvement$310kHousing & Shelter$295kReligion$218kPhilanthropy$100kAnimals$70kHuman Services$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $240k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT$110,000
THE LAMB CENTER$30,000
CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC$25,000
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$20,000
CARROLLWOOD DAY SCHOOL$20,000
COMUNIDAD$15,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS$15,000
FEEDING AMERICA$15,000
KENYA CONNECTION$15,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
LISTENING HEARTS MINISTRIES$15,000
BRIDGES BALITMORE$15,000
THE V FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
INDIAN RIVERLAND TRUST$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER: $5k → 12%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
AR
NC
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 23 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$2.1M
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+20%

Still filing today

52%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT
    7× · 2017–2023 · $595k · revenue +3%
  • TL
    THE LAMB CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +107%
  • CS
    CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $80k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • MH
    MISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +24%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -66%
  • MR
    MESA REFUGE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $38k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
4
National College Advising Corps Inc

College advising corps (cac) is the nation's largest nonprofit service organization dedicated to advancing educational equity and expanding opportunity for all high school students. cac provides college enrollment and career guidance to…

Education
5
Washington International School

Our mission is to be an exemplary learning community - enriched by differences, informed through inquiry, global in reach.

Education
6
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
9
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
10
United Way of Lewis County

The mission of united way of lewis county (uwlc) is connecting people and resources to improve the quality of life in lewis county. uwlc has evolved from its roots as a fundraising organization to a critical community impact organization…

Philanthropy
11
United Way of Washington County Maryland Inc

Through strategic leadership and investments, united way of washington county, md will impact community improvement and inspire collaboration to address critical needs in education, income and health.

Philanthropy
12
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Against Poverty Inc and the most unlike its peers is Justice High School Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%46%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT — $310,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENTSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL RESTRICTED FUND — $225,000 · OtherSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL RESTRICTED FUNDUNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $100,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INCLISTENING HEARTS MINISTRIES — $90,000 · OtherLISTENING HEARTS MINISTRIESMETRO MINISTRIES — $54,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY — $45,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORS — $45,000 · OtherMESA REFUGE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $37,500 · Other+19 more — $217,000 · Other+19 moreTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $594,813 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECTKENYA CONNECTION — $49,000 · InternationalKENYA CONNECTIONMISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC — $100,000 · EducationMISS HALL'S …CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $80,000 · EducationCORNERSTONE …CARROLLWOOD DAY SCHOOL EDUCATION INC — $77,000 · EducationCARROLLWOOD …BRIDGES BALTIMORE INC — $25,000 · EducationBRIDGES BALT…NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $200,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHSIDE…+1 more — $2,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LAMB CENTER — $95,000 · EnvironmentINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentTHE V FOUNDATION — $47,000 · HealthFeeding America — $45,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,124,000International$643,813Education$282,000Community Improvement$202,000Environment$120,000Health$47,000Food & Nutrition$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $594,813 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $200,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetMISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LAMB CENTER — $95,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCARROLLWOOD DAY SCHOOL EDUCATION INC — $77,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKENYA CONNECTION — $49,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMESA REFUGE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $37,500 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGES BALTIMORE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL UNION MISSION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJustice High School Scholarship Fund Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WILDLIFE CENTER OF VIRGINIA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVERIDITAS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds MISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INC
  • Who funds THE LAMB CENTER
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON DC INC
  • Who funds CARROLLWOOD DAY SCHOOL EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds KENYA CONNECTION
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds MESA REFUGE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds BRIDGES BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL UNION MISSION
  • Who funds Justice High School Scholarship Fund Inc
  • Who funds CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC
  • Who funds THE WILDLIFE CENTER OF VIRGINIA
  • Who funds VERIDITAS INC
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY14.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization High Poplars Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph