· Private foundation
Hetzel-Long Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEADSUP FOX CITIES | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WI GREEN BAY FOUNDATION | $27,500 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER GREEN BAY | $12,500 |
| VOCES DE LA FRONTERA | $10,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL | $500 |
| MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE | $500 |
| LITERACY GREEN BAY INC | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +24%
- CHCATALPA HEALTH INC2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +17%
- AEAPPLETON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAYone grant, 2021 · $38k
- CACASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- BCBorder Community Alliance Incone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.
Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.
To be a safe haven and human voice for all animals in need.
The mission of casa of east central wisconsin is to advocate for the best interest of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, who are in need of court protection, to ensure they have a safe and permanent home and the opportunity to…
Establish and maintain child advocacy centers and teams in wisconsin.
Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
Wisconsin court appointed special advocates (casa) association champions the needs of abused and neglected children by supporting and expanding local casa programs.
Midwest environmental advocates is a nonprofit law center that combines the power of law with the resolve of communities facing environmental injustice to secure and protect the rights of all people to healthy water, land, and air.
Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.
Nyc bird alliance is a grassroots community that protects wild birds and habitat in the five boroughs, improving the quality of life for all new yorkers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
- Who funds HEADSUP FOX CITIES CORP ↗
- Who funds CASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Border Community Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds FATHER CARRS PLACE 2-B LTD ↗
- Who funds VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC ↗
- Who funds CATALPA HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds APPLETON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds FOX VALLEY HUMANE ASSOCIATION LTD ↗
- Who funds REDBIRD VOCAL MUSIC BOOSTER ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN PET SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Mielke Family Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hetzel-Long Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hetzel-Long Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hetzel-Long Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.