· Private foundation
Herman Yudacufski Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k44 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| ST JOSEPH'S CENTER | $15,000 |
| GEISINGER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SCHUYLKILL COUNTY MUNICIPAL AUTHORI | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| NATIVITY BVM HIGH SCHOOL | $4,100 |
| SCHUYLKILL AREA COMM FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| HELPING HARVEST | $1,500 |
| MT SINAI MED CTR FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| TAMAQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT | $1,000 |
| CAMP VICTORY | $1,000 |
| WVIA | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| DAVE MARY ALPER JCC | $1,000 |
| SWEET ARROW LAKE CONSERVATION ASSOC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
81 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SJST JOSEPHS CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +59%
- SCSCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION7× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +45%
- RTRyan Township Fire Company5× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $10k
- NMNEPA MANUFAT EMP COUNCILone grant, 2019 · $6k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote commercial, industrial, and civil interest in schuylkill county, pa.
Coordinating, promoting and developing the arts and humanities in schuylkill county pennsylvania
To improve volunteer fire service in Schuylkill County
To unite various schuylkill haven area stakeholders to promote economic growth and revitalizationi in the borough of schuylkill haven, pennsylvania and surrounding communities.
Provide community with Fire and Ambulance service
The mission of the schuylkill area community foundation is to serve the interests of the philanthropic donors and to become stewards of financial gifts that support our community.
Fire protection and emergency services
Provides volunteer fire protection and rescue services to the seelyville, pa and surrounding area.
Volunteer fire company
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Schuylkill County Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is Downtown Shenandoah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JOSEPHS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds NICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds Ryan Township Fire Company ↗
- Who funds AVENUES ↗
- Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Downtown Shenandoah Inc ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLKILL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLKILL UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLKILL CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds POLISH AMERICAN FIRE COMPANY #4 ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Will S & Anna S Fox Foundation · Ben D Spagolio Charitable Trust · Ppl Foundation · Thomas J West Family Char Trust · Comerford Mary Tw Charitable (Pf) · Benevolent Association of Pottsville · Anna C Bohorad Trust B · Schuylkill Area Community Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Miter Charitable Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Herman Yudacufski Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Herman Yudacufski Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Herman Yudacufski Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.