Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas J West Family Char Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$109kPublic Safety & Disaster$86kCommunity Improvement$59kHealth$38kPhilanthropy$27kAnimals$24kPublic Benefit$13kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$500
Median grant
10
States reached
$651k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEAST PA MAN & EMP COUNCIL$13,500
ST JOSEPH CENTER FOR$6,000
DOWNTOWN SHENANDOAH INC$5,000
POTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF AMERICA$2,000
AVENUES FOUNDATION$1,620
BLUE MOUNTAIN GRIDIRON CLUB$1,500
HILLSIDE SPCA$1,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,500
CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION$1,250
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FD$1,000
WALK IN ART CENTER$967
SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER$500
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $2k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $1k → 12%AVENUES FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $1k → 12%SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $500 → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $500 → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $500 → 12%SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $500 → 12%SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $419 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$383k · 40 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
8

Total granted

$383k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+29%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    Downtown Shenandoah Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue ×14
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • SC
    SCHUYLKILL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $23k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • HA
    HAMBURG AREA MUSIC ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • BM
    BLUE MOUNTAIN YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -55%
  • CO
    CIRCLE OF FRIENDS
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
7
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
8
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Refugees International Inc

Refugees international advocates for lifesaving assistance, human rights, and protection for displaced people and promotes solutions to displacement crisis.

International
10
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
11
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Downtown Shenandoah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts EducationSupportive Housing & Mental…Volunteer Fire & Rescue Ser…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Education and Develop…Regional Community Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr21%15%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr21%32%10–20yr21%32%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr13%5%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
10%
2,339/23,180

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHEAST PA MAN & EMP COUNCIL — $84,000 · OtherNORTHEAST PA MAN & EMP COUNCILST JOSEPH CENTER FOR — $60,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CENTER FORPOTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,507 · OtherPOTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient — $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FD — $12,500 · OtherREIKICATSHAVEN — $10,700 · Other+29 more — $43,945 · Other+29 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $29,500 · HealthPLANNED PA…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,750 · HealthAMERICAN C…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthDowntown Shenandoah Inc — $32,965 · Community ImprovementDowntown S…SCHUYLKILL CONNECTS — $3,000 · Community ImprovementSCHUYLKILL…SCHUYLKILL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC — $23,359 · EmploymentAVENUES FOUNDATION — $16,570 · Human ServicesSCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS — $5,919 · Human Services+1 more — $700 · Human ServicesHillside SPCA Inc — $13,500 · AnimalsCRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION — $6,500 · EducationWALK IN ART CENTER INC — $2,554 · EducationWYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $2,500 · Education
Other$249,152Health$38,250Community Improvement$35,965Employment$23,359Human Services$23,189Animals$13,500Education$11,554

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDowntown Shenandoah Inc — $32,965 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $29,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSCHUYLKILL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC — $23,359 over 4y, 12% of budgetPOTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,507 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAVENUES FOUNDATION — $16,570 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetHillside SPCA Inc — $13,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSCHUYLKILL UNITED WAY — $8,169 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetSCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS — $5,919 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSCHUYLKILL CONNECTS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetWALK IN ART CENTER INC — $2,554 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSCHUYLKILL COUNTY COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS INC — $2,045 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD SURGICAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOSE COMPANY 1 — $875 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc — $500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRURAL NEIGHBORHOODS INC — $450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FROM HUNGER — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAREFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Downtown Shenandoah Inc
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds POTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds AVENUES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Hillside SPCA Inc
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL UNITED WAY
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL CONNECTS
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WALK IN ART CENTER INC
  • Who funds WYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL COUNTY COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds WORLD SURGICAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOSE COMPANY 1
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Will S & Anna S Fox FoundationPA30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Will S & Anna S Fox Foundation · Ben D Spagolio Charitable Trust · Comerford Mary Tw Charitable (Pf) · Anna C Bohorad Trust B · Herman Yudacufski Charitable Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Miles S & Anna Kiehner Memorial Trust Co Argent Trust Company · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas J West Family Char Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas J West Family Char Trust?

Find your warmest path to Thomas J West Family Char Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph