Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION

SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $368,015 to it, the largest being LEHIGH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($92,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$4.7M
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$368k
Net assets
$2.8M
7/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Schuylkill Community Action does

Mission

Schuylkill Community Action is a private, nonprofit corporationincorporated under the laws of the commonwealth of pennsylvania. Theprimary purpose of Schuylkill Community Action is to coordinate andfocus all available resources upon the needs of low-income schuylkill county residents, enabling them to obtain safe, decent and affordablehousing and secure the opportunities necessary to achieve self-sufficiency.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Provide food, shelter, and social services to low-income individuals inschuylkill county, pa. Schuylkill Community Action served thousands of individuals during the fiscal year and disbursed over $2.5m in funds through food service, weatherization asssitance, home heating assistance, and other assistance to individuals in need.

    $4,448,695 spentof which $2,001,602 as grants$674,313 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $4,448,695.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.2M) Expenses 100 ($3.3M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 146 ($4.7M) Expenses 151 ($4.9M) Net assets 154 ($3.2M)2019 Revenue 109 ($3.5M) Expenses 111 ($3.6M) Net assets 148 ($3.1M)2020 Revenue 113 ($3.6M) Expenses 109 ($3.6M) Net assets 151 ($3.2M)2021 Revenue 177 ($5.7M) Expenses 179 ($5.8M) Net assets 144 ($3.0M)2022 Revenue 366 ($12M) Expenses 359 ($12M) Net assets 148 ($3.1M)2023 Revenue 286 ($9.2M) Expenses 282 ($9.2M) Net assets 147 ($3.1M)2024 Revenue 202 ($6.5M) Expenses 201 ($6.6M) Net assets 144 ($3.0M)2025 Revenue 145 ($4.7M) Expenses 149 ($4.9M) Net assets 136 ($2.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (145)Expenses (149)Net assets (136)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $7.4M to $5.3M (−28%).

$2.4M
$3.7M
$3.3M
$3.4M
$5.1M
$5.7M
$7.4M
$5.3M
$4.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 70% · 2018 73% · 2019 70% · 2020 69% · 2021 83% · 2022 92% · 2023 90% · 2024 85% · 2025 79%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$40k
’17
−$216k
’18
−$126k
’19
$70k
’20
−$143k
’21
$75k
’22
−$4k
’23
−$56k
’24
−$175k
’25
3.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

David R Young

Chief executive officer

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed55566552323
Joined·+0+0+2+0+0+0+18+1
No longer listed·00101001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $5k → $48k.

7 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 56% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 11 of 12 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION.

25%
largest funder
58%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 36% · 2021 95% · 2022 98% · 2023 60% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 58% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

56% of SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $162k that is directly attributable, 66% of it comes from Pennsylvania funders.

PA
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $206k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $283k on record.

Federal$283k
grants $283kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$283k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 8%Fundraising 1%

Governance

23
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION?
SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $368,015 to it, the largest being LEHIGH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($92,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $368,015 in grants to SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION?
LEHIGH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $92,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SCHUYLKILL COMMUNITY ACTION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Schuylkill Community Action →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing