Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Benevolent Association of Pottsville

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$124kHuman Services$29kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$14kCommunity Improvement$8kRecreation & Sports$8kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$775k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
Majestic Theatre Organization$3,500
SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER$3,000
Shanandoah Valley Band Boosters Inc$2,500
St Joseph's Center for Special Lear$2,500
ORWIGSBURG LIBRARY$2,100
Schuylkill Coounty Historical Socie$2,080
Individual grant recipient$2,000
RINGTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOC$1,500
North Schuylkill Band Boosters Asso$1,300
MAHANOY CITY LIBRARY$1,000
Trinity Episcopal Summer Reading Ca$1,000
TREMONT AREA FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
SCHUYLKILL HAVEN FREE PUBLIC LIBRAR$700
FRACKVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $3k → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $3k → 12%Schuylkill Women in Crisis: $2k → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $2k → 12%Schuylkill Women in Crisis: $2k → 12%SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER: $2k → 12%Schuylkill Women in Crisis: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$180k · 25 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
27

Total granted

$180k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+22%

Still filing today

32%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    POTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +12%
  • SW
    SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue +12%
  • SU
    SCHUYLKILL UNITED WAY
    3× · 2019–2022 · $3k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • OD
    Open Door Project
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -70%
  • SC
    Schuylkill County Special Olympics
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • TS
    The Salvation Army Pottsville Corps
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Claysburg Area Public Library Inc

Library services to the community

Education
2
Fredericktown Area Public Library

Public library

Education
3
Burrell Township Library

Public library service

Arts & Culture
4
Monaca Public Library

To provide Library Services to the general public.

5
Albion Area Public Library

Operation of non-profit public library in albion, pa

Education
6
Sinclairville Free Library

Public library

Education
7
Roaring Spring Community Library Association

To provide a free public library in roaring spring, blair county, pa

Education
8
Leechburg Public Library

Operation of local library

9
Swaney Memorial Library

Library for tri-state area residents

10
Johnsonburg Public Library

Provide library services to residents of the johnsonburg, pa area

11
Wyalusing Public Library

Provide public library services for wyalusing, pennsylvania and surrounding areas to inspire lifelong learning, advance knowledge and strengthen communities.

Education
12
Stony Creek Free Library

Public Library

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Schuylkill Haven Free Public Library and the most unlike its peers is Dustins Adventureland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%0%<5yr13%13%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr21%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr18%8%10–20yr19%4%20–35yr13%81%35–55yr21%4%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
6%
48/823

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

POTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $55,000 · OtherPOTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARYMajestic Theatre Organization — $18,000 · OtherMajestic Theatre OrganizationORWIGSBURG LIBRARY — $16,100 · OtherORWIGSBURG LIBRARYNURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $10,975 · OtherNURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIPMAHANOY CITY LIBRARY — $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $9,000 · Other+42 more — $75,270 · Other+42 moreSCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS — $13,500 · Human ServicesKEYSTONE STATE LITERACY ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · EducationTAMAQUA PUBLIC LIBRARY — $2,000 · EducationTRI-VALLEY FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $1,500 · EducationCHILD DEVELOPMENT INC — $1,050 · EducationMINERSVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC — $600 · EducationOpen Door Project — $2,500 · Community ImprovementDUSTINS ADVENTURELAND — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCHUYLKILL BALLET THEATRE — $500 · Arts & CultureGAUDENZIA INC — $400 · Health
Other$193,345Human Services$13,500Education$7,650Community Improvement$2,500Youth Development$2,000Arts & Culture$500Health$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $55,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS — $13,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSCHUYLKILL UNITED WAY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRINGTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $2,900 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKEYSTONE STATE LITERACY ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOpen Door Project — $2,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTAMAQUA PUBLIC LIBRARY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDUSTINS ADVENTURELAND — $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSCHUYLKILL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRI-VALLEY FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $1,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSCHUYLKILL HAVEN FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $1,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT INC — $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRACKVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPORT CARBON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $600 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMINERSVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC — $600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSCHUYLKILL BALLET THEATRE — $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGAUDENZIA INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POTTSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL UNITED WAY
  • Who funds RINGTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds KEYSTONE STATE LITERACY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Open Door Project
  • Who funds TAMAQUA PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds DUSTINS ADVENTURELAND
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds TRI-VALLEY FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL HAVEN FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds FRACKVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Snayberger Memorial Fdn (Pf)NY32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Snayberger Memorial Fdn (Pf) · Ppl Foundation · Ben D Spagolio Charitable Trust · Schuylkill Area Community Foundation · Herman Yudacufski Charitable Foundation · Will S & Anna S Fox Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Benevolent Association of Pottsville funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Benevolent Association of Pottsville?

    Find your warmest path to Benevolent Association of Pottsville through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph