Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herman and Pauline Berman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$41kHuman Services$18kArts & Culture$16kPhilanthropy$14kInternational$8kRecreation & Sports$5kEducation$4kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$260k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC$2,000
UJA - FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$1,800
PPHP$1,500
COLORECTAL CANCER COALITION INC$1,000
PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
LAMPION CENTER$1,000
ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC$1,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$1,000
PBS FOUNDATION$1,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO$700
VISITING NURSE ASSOC OF SW INDIANA$500
BACKYARD SPORTS CARES$500
KEEP EVANSVILLE BEAUTIFUL INC$500
RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAMPION CENTER: $1k → 15%LAMPION CENTER: $1k → 15%LAMPION CENTER: $1k → 15%LAMPION CENTER: $1k → 15%LAMPION CENTER: $850 → 15%LAMPION CENTER: $750 → 15%LAMPION CENTER: $750 → 15%LAMPION CENTER: $750 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 18 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$112k
$2k

Still filing today

72%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +27%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $8k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc

Our mission is to take bold action to improve the lives of everyone impacted by pancreatic cancer by advancing scientific research, building community, sharing knowledge, and advocating for patients.

Health
2
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
3
National Breast Cancer Coalition Fund

Nbcc's mission is "to end breast cancer through the power of action and advocacy." nbcc is made up of activists who set a programmatic and research agenda to end breast cancer and use the power of action and advocacy to fight the breast…

Housing & Shelter
4
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
7
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
8
Breastcancerorg

Our mission is to help people make sense of the complex medical and personal information about breast health and breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their lives.

Health
9
Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition

The pa breast cancer coalition represents, supports, and serves breast cancer survivors and their families in pa through educational programming, legislative advocacy, and breast cancer research grants. the pbcc is a statewide non-profit…

Philanthropy
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
12
Brooklyn Community Foundation

Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is New York City Ballet Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC: $8,400 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PE…PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthPEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATIONFIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC: $8,000 · HealthFIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INCVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA INC: $4,250 · HealthVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION O…RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4,250 · OtherRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIO…PPHP: $4,000 · OtherPPHPMAKE-A-WISH AMERICA: $3,700 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH AMERICAADATH B'NAI ISRAEL TEMPLE: $2,000 · OtherADATH B'NAI ISRAEL TEMPLEEVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $2,000 · OtherEVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNIT…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $1,800 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEALBACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC: $5,000 · OtherBACKYARD SPORTS CARES INCKEEP EVANSVILLE BEAUTIFUL INC: $4,000 · OtherKEEP EVANSVILLE BEAUTIFUL …NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY B…NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $4,700 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC…PBS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePBS FOUNDATIONLAMPION CENTER INC: $7,300 · Human ServicesLAMPION CENTER…ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $7,300 · Human ServicesALBION FELLOWS…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $12,600 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWIS…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · InternationalTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$28,650Other$26,750Arts & Culture$15,700Human Services$14,600Philanthropy$12,600International$8,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $12,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC: $8,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAMPION CENTER INC: $7,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $7,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC: $5,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $4,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA INC: $4,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKEEP EVANSVILLE BEAUTIFUL INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $2,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMPION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds KEEP EVANSVILLE BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herman and Pauline Berman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herman and Pauline Berman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herman and Pauline Berman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph