Skip to content
Herbert H Redl Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Herbert H Redl Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$353k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$691kEducation$273kHuman Services$194kArts & Culture$76kFood & Nutrition$55kYouth Development$18kAnimals$12kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $195k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIA FARERI CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE$120,000
FAMILY SERVICES$75,000
MIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOL$40,000
MARIST COLLEGE$35,000
COMMON GROUND$25,000
MID HUDSON DISCOVERY MUSEUM$13,287
BARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE$10,000
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA DUTCHESS COUN$10,000
CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE$10,000
ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$4,000
WALKWAY OVER THE HUDSON$3,000
HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE$2,750
SUSAN G KOMEN$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CLAUDIO CARES FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $155k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $20k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $13k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $10k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $10k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $5k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $1k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $1k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $500 → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $250 → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $100 → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 33 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+7%

Still filing today

39%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARIST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +52%
  • HV
    Hudson Valley Hospice Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $177k · revenue +193%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • MF
    MARIA FARERI CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR VASSAR BROS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • DC
    DUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
2
Northern Dutchess Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
3
Gouverneur Hospital

Our mission is to provide skilled, compassionate, cost-effective care that promotes wellness and meets the community's healthcare needs.

Health
4
Canton-Potsdam Hospital

Canton potsdam hospital's mission is to provide skilled, compassionate, cost-effective care that promotes wellness and meets community needs.

Health
5
Vassar Health Connecticut Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
6
Nassau Suffolk Hospital Council Inc

& part iii, line 1: the mission of the nassau-suffolk hospital council, inc. (nshc) is to:- provide a forum for the exchange of ideas regarding the development of regional, state, and national health policy,- identify key policy issues…

—
7
Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center Inc

The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
The Rochester General Hospital

To establish, erect and maintain a general hospital and dispensary in the county of monroe, ny for medical and surgical aid, care and treatment of persons in need thereof; to carry on and conduct a training school for nurses; to promote…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arlington Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIA FARERI CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE: $220,000 · OtherMARIA FARERI CHILDRENS HEALTHCAREMIDHUDON REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $156,750 · OtherMIDHUDON REGIONAL HOSPITALFAMILY SERVICES INC: $150,200 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES INCMARIA FARERI CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE SERVICES: $100,000 · OtherMARIA FARERI CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE SERVICESCOMMON GROUND: $45,000 · OtherCOMMON GROUNDBARDAVON OPERA HOUSE: $38,485 · Other+39 more: $67,900 · Other+39 moreMARIST UNIVERSITY: $220,000 · EducationMARIST UNIVERSITYMIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOL: $40,000 · EducationMIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOLARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationHudson Valley Hospice Inc: $176,600 · Human ServicesHudson Valley Hosp…CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $31,250 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF…GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $11,700 · Human ServicesBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMID-HUDSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM D/B/A MID-HUDSON DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $13,287 · Arts & CultureTHE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD: $8,500 · Arts & CultureMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $13,500 · HealthVassar Brothers Medical Center: $5,000 · HealthVassar Brothers Hospital Foundation: $5,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $2,250 · Health+2 more: $550 · HealthDUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC: $10,250 · AnimalsSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $7,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMON GROUND FARM INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$778,335Education$271,000Human Services$219,550Arts & Culture$41,787Health$26,300Animals$10,250Food & Nutrition$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY: $220,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Valley Hospice Inc: $176,600 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC: $150,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOL: $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $31,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMID-HUDSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM D/B/A MID-HUDSON DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $13,287 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $11,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC: $10,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTHE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD: $8,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROBERT F KENNEDY CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVassar Brothers Medical Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVassar Brothers Hospital Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER HUDSON VALLEY INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMON GROUND FARM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLAUDIO CARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetPLEASANT VALLEY FREE LIBRARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTACONIC RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations…The Dyson FoundationUlster Savings Charit…Evelyn M Davies Chari…James J McCann Charit…JM McDonald Foundatio…The Millman-Harris-Ro…The William Brown Fou…The Ascienzo Family F…Rose & Kiernan Charit…Peckham Family Founda…The Vincent and Carol…
Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY38.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · The Dyson Foundation · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Evelyn M Davies Charitable Trust Mark V Dennis Trustee · James J McCann Charitable Trust · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Millman-Harris-Romano Foundation · The William Brown Foundation Inc Co Morrison Cohen LLP · The Ascienzo Family Foundation · Rose & Kiernan Charitable Foundation Inc · Peckham Family Foundation · The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herbert H Redl Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herbert H Redl Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herbert H Redl Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Herbert H Redl Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herbert H Redl Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home