Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herbert H Redl Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$353k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$691kEducation$273kHuman Services$194kArts & Culture$76kFood & Nutrition$55kYouth Development$18kAnimals$12kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $195k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIA FARERI CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE$120,000
FAMILY SERVICES$75,000
MIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOL$40,000
MARIST COLLEGE$35,000
COMMON GROUND$25,000
MID HUDSON DISCOVERY MUSEUM$13,287
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA DUTCHESS COUN$10,000
CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE$10,000
BARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE$10,000
ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$4,000
WALKWAY OVER THE HUDSON$3,000
HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE$2,750
SUSAN G KOMEN$1,250
CLAUDIO CARES FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $155k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $20k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $13k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $10k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $10k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $5k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $1k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $1k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $500 → 9%HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE: $250 → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $100 → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 33 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+7%

Still filing today

39%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARIST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +52%
  • HV
    Hudson Valley Hospice Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $177k · revenue +193%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • MF
    MARIA FARERI CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR VASSAR BROS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • DC
    DUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
2
Northern Dutchess Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
3
Gouverneur Hospital

Our mission is to provide skilled, compassionate, cost-effective care that promotes wellness and meets the community's healthcare needs.

Health
4
Canton-Potsdam Hospital

Canton potsdam hospital's mission is to provide skilled, compassionate, cost-effective care that promotes wellness and meets community needs.

Health
5
Vassar Health Connecticut Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
6
Nassau Suffolk Hospital Council Inc

& part iii, line 1: the mission of the nassau-suffolk hospital council, inc. (nshc) is to:- provide a forum for the exchange of ideas regarding the development of regional, state, and national health policy,- identify key policy issues…

7
Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center Inc

The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
The Rochester General Hospital

To establish, erect and maintain a general hospital and dispensary in the county of monroe, ny for medical and surgical aid, care and treatment of persons in need thereof; to carry on and conduct a training school for nurses; to promote…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arlington Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDisability & Human ServicesIndependent SchoolsRegional Arts & Culture Org…Animal Rescue and ShelterTeacher Union Benefit TrustsImmigrant & Underserved You…Public Library Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr20%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr20%59%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
9%
156/1,799

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARIA FARERI CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE — $220,000 · OtherMARIA FARERI CHILDRENS HEALTHCAREMIDHUDON REGIONAL HOSPITAL — $156,750 · OtherMIDHUDON REGIONAL HOSPITALFAMILY SERVICES INC — $150,200 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES INCMARIA FARERI CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE SERVICES — $100,000 · OtherMARIA FARERI CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE SERVICESCOMMON GROUND — $45,000 · OtherCOMMON GROUNDBARDAVON OPERA HOUSE — $38,485 · Other+39 more — $67,900 · Other+39 moreMARIST UNIVERSITY — $220,000 · EducationMARIST UNIVERSITYMIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOL — $40,000 · EducationMIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOLARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationHudson Valley Hospice Inc — $176,600 · Human ServicesHudson Valley Hosp…CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC — $31,250 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF…GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC — $11,700 · Human ServicesBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE — $20,000 · Arts & CultureMID-HUDSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM D/B/A MID-HUDSON DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $13,287 · Arts & CultureTHE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD — $8,500 · Arts & CultureMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC — $13,500 · HealthVassar Brothers Medical Center — $5,000 · HealthVassar Brothers Hospital Foundation — $5,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $2,250 · Health+2 more — $550 · HealthDUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC — $10,250 · AnimalsSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $7,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMON GROUND FARM INC — $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$778,335Education$271,000Human Services$219,550Arts & Culture$41,787Health$26,300Animals$10,250Food & Nutrition$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY — $220,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Valley Hospice Inc — $176,600 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC — $150,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMIZZENTOP DAY SCHOOL — $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC — $31,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMID-HUDSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM D/B/A MID-HUDSON DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $13,287 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGRACE SMITH HOUSE INC — $11,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC — $10,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTHE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD — $8,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROBERT F KENNEDY CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVassar Brothers Medical Center — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVassar Brothers Hospital Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER HUDSON VALLEY INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND FARM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLAUDIO CARES FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetPLEASANT VALLEY FREE LIBRARY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTACONIC RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY38.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · The Dyson Foundation · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Evelyn M Davies Charitable Trust Mark V Dennis Trustee · James J McCann Charitable Trust · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The Millman-Harris-Romano Foundation · The William Brown Foundation Inc Co Morrison Cohen LLP · The Ascienzo Family Foundation · Rose & Kiernan Charitable Foundation Inc · Peckham Family Foundation · The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herbert H Redl Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herbert H Redl Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Herbert H Redl Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph