· Private foundation
Henschel Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RISING HEROES | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ENGLEWOOD HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| P E F ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC | $5,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $5,000 |
| TEMPLE SINAI | $4,723 |
| PALS | $4,391 |
| PLAY FOR PINK | $3,000 |
| BABY2BABY | $2,500 |
| JCC ON THE PALISADES | $2,500 |
| PAN MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE | $2,500 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY | $2,500 |
| ARTISTS AGAINST ANTISEMITISM | $2,000 |
| BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue +17%
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES4× · 2019–2023 · $20k · revenue +115%
NORTHFIELD MOUNT HERMON SCHOOL6× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- CBCURE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -12%
- TMTHE MARK SCHONWETTER HOLOCAUST EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +31%
- NNATALone grant, 2023 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…
Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parkinson's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Diabetes Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds NORTHFIELD MOUNT HERMON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RISING HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PRAGER METIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR DIABETES RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CURE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · The Community Chest of Englewood · The Kaplen Foundation · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · The Provident Bank Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Verizon Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henschel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope and Safety Inc — 69% of income from government
- Women's Rights Information Center — 16% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Family Service Agency of Central Nj — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Services of Northern New Jersey Inc — 1% of income from government
- Norman Williams Public Library Inc — 0% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.