Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henry S and Patrice Hemingway Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

86% of Henry S and Patrice Hemingway Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Nature Conservancy, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
3
’18
3
’19
3
’20
2
’21
1
’22
3
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$188kEnvironment$127kEducation$71kRecreation & Sports$35kArts & Culture$13kPublic Benefit$10kAnimals$6kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$79k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$100,000
UTAH DONOR COLLABORATIVE$10,000
STEWARDSHIP UTAH$5,000
PIONEER THEATER$1,000
HENRY FORD FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CIRCLE THE WAGONS: $500 → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $2k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $1k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $1k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 9 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$303k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+157%

Still filing today

56%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    5× · 2017–2023 · $188k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD
    4× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue -85%
  • WU
    WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue -35%

Funded once

  • CM
    COACH MIKE'S FRIENDS OF TENNIS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CC
    CANYON COUNTRY DISCOVERY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • HF
    HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +157%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wasatch Wigeons Association

Improve utah's wetlands through hands-on conservation and community engagement

Animals
2
Utah Geological Foundation
—
3
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
4
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

—
5
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
6
Save Our Great Salt Lake
Environment
7
Trails Utah

Trails Utah is dedicated to trails advocacy, planning, funding, and construction in needed areas throughout the state.

Environment
8
Sci Utah Foundation

To ensure the future of wildlife through conservation, education and hunting.

Animals
9
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
10
Utah Open Lands Conservation Association Inc

Utah Open Lands' mission is to preserve and protect open space, in perpetuity, in order to maintain Utah's natural heritage and quality of life for present and future generations. The purpose of Utah Open Lands is to permanently protect…

Environment
11
Utah Rivers Council Inc

The utah rivers council is dedicated to the conservation and stewardship of utahs rivers and sustainable clean water sources for utahs people and wildlife.

Environment
12
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens Committee to Save Our; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Womens Education in the Rural World. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $187,600 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $101,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD: $40,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLDCOACH MIKE'S FRIENDS OF TENNIS: $25,000 · OtherCOACH MIKE'S FRIENDS OF TENNISCITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR: $20,000 · Other+8 more: $34,970 · Other+8 moreWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $30,900 · EducationIntermountain Therapy Animals: $4,150 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCIRCLES OF COMFORT: $500 · Human ServicesSTEWARDSHIP UTAH: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$408,570Education$30,900Human Services$6,150Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $101,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD: $40,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $30,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetUtah Donor Collaborative: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSTEWARDSHIP UTAH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIntermountain Therapy Animals: $4,150 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCLES OF COMFORT: $500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR ↗
  • Who funds Utah Donor Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds STEWARDSHIP UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLES OF COMFORT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry S and Patrice Hemingway Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry S and Patrice Hemingway Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Henry S and Patrice Hemingway Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Henry S and Patrice Hemingway Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry S and Patrice Hemingway’s filings →

    More from the funding graph