Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD

FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD (Utah) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being HENRY S AND PATRICE HEMINGWAY FOUNDATION ($40,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$42k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$60k
Net assets
$736k
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 20%
01What it does

What Foundation for Womens Education in the Rural World does

Mission

To provide a quality educational opportunity for village girls in rural India

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Funded 120 Scholarships for 2024-25 school year. Due to unforseen difficulties the money was not able to be transferred until 2026

    $13,200 spent
    46% of program spending
  2. Provided funds for library materials. Due to problems transferring the funds could not be transferred until 2026

    $4,000 spent
    14% of program spending
  3. Provided support for teachers salaries. Due to problems transferring the funds. Transfer could not be completed before year end. Funds were sent in 2026.

    $4,000 spent
    14% of program spending
  4. Funded reduction in student bus fees. Due to problems with the transfer of funds. Funds could not be sent before year end. Funds were sent in 2026.

    $3,500 spent
    12% of program spending
  5. Support for Science Lab. Funds will be sent as soon as problem transferring funds can be solved. Funds were sent in 2026

    $4,000 spent
    14% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $28,700.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($288k) Expenses 100 ($38k) Net assets 100 ($416k)2019 Revenue 60 ($173k) Expenses 175 ($67k) Net assets 126 ($522k)2020 Revenue 21 ($61k) Expenses 66 ($25k) Net assets 134 ($558k)2021 Revenue 44 ($128k) Expenses 83 ($32k) Net assets 156 ($648k)2022 Revenue 31 ($90k) Expenses 166 ($63k) Net assets 132 ($550k)2023 Revenue 26 ($74k) Expenses 60 ($23k) Net assets 154 ($638k)2024 Revenue 19 ($53k) Expenses 64 ($24k) Net assets 159 ($661k)2025 Revenue 14 ($42k) Expenses 76 ($29k) Net assets 177 ($736k)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (14)Expenses (76)Net assets (177)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $416k to $522k (+26%).

$416k
$522k
$558k
$648k
$550k
$638k
$661k
$736k
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$250k
’18
$107k
’19
$36k
’20
$96k
’21
$27k
’22
$51k
’23
$29k
’24
$13k
’25
31
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Camille Tarics

Chairman and Scholarship Coordinator

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121211111212129
Joined·+0+0+4+1+0+0+0
No longer listed·0140003
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $5k → $10k.

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 33% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

33% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD.

67%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD's grant income comes from Utah funders.

UT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’20
’21
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $20k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

57%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD?
FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD (Utah) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being HENRY S AND PATRICE HEMINGWAY FOUNDATION ($40,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $60,000 in grants to FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD?
HENRY S AND PATRICE HEMINGWAY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $40,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FOUNDATION FOR WOMENS EDUCATION IN THE RURAL WORLD find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Foundation for Womens Education in the Rural World →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing