· Private foundation
Henry P & Susan C Crowell Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of HENRY P & SUSAN C CROWELL TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k48 grants · $3.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL- DAI | $200,000 |
| FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY | $200,000 |
| BANGUI EVANGELICAL SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY (BEST)FATEB | $175,000 |
| PIONEERS | $150,000 |
| INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $125,000 |
| SCHOLARLEADERS | $110,000 |
| BIBLE STUDENTS FELLOWSHIP OF BANGLADESH (BSFB) - (DAI FISCAL SPONSOR) | $100,000 |
| ELAM MINISTRIES | $100,000 |
| LIFE IN ABUNDANCE INTERNATIONAL | $100,000 |
| MORNING STAR DEVELOPMENT | $100,000 |
| ARAB BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ABTS | $100,000 |
| THORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND | $100,000 |
| THE VERITAS FORUM | $90,000 |
| HOPE4MENA | $85,000 |
| A FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
128 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $680k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +18%
- DADevelopment Assoc International5× · 2020–2024 · $910k · revenue +8%
- MSMorning Star Development5× · 2020–2024 · $480k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- BEBangui Evangelical School Of Theologyone grant, 2022 · $200k
- BEBangui Evangelical School Of Theology (Best)one grant, 2020 · $150k
- BSBible Students Fellowship of Bangladesh-DAI Fiscal Sponsorone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.
International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Saiacs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 221 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds Development Assoc International ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds Morning Star Development ↗
- Who funds THORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds Friends of Forman Christian College Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE4MENA INC ↗
- Who funds A FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN ↗
- Who funds SAT-7 NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds STEIGER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ↗
- Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Edify ↗
- Who funds ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
- Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
- Who funds PROJECT MEDSEND ↗
- Who funds VERITAS COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS FOR BIBLICAL EQUALITY ↗
- Who funds MEDIA ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds LIFE IN ABUNDANCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Generosity Foundation Trust · First Fruit Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Tyndale House Ministries · G II Charities · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Gordon Christian Trust · Servant Foundation · Stewardship Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust · The Bolick Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henry P & Susan C Crowell Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Henry P & Susan C Crowell Trust?
Find your warmest path to Henry P & Susan C Crowell Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.