Skip to content
Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital

See schedule opurpose:be the trusted regional leader to inspire and deliver optimal health and wellness.vision:to be the most patient-centric hospital anywhere.

$8.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$373k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$20MRecreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$397kCommunity Improvement$254kHousing & Shelter$144kEmployment$105kHuman Services$100kPhilanthropy$36k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $503,771, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,692,308 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,188,537 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
  • $250k+1 grant · $373k
$23,780
Median grant
2
States reached
$704M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM S HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT$372,958
BRIDGE TO HOME SCV$49,450
COC FOUNDATION$25,000
SANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC$23,780
COFFEY COMMUNICATIONS INC$15,034
SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF VALENCIA$11,500
SUPERIOR LIFE SUPPORT$6,049
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SCV SENIOR CENTER: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 14 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$23M
$311k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+29%

Still filing today

64%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20M · revenue +5% · 87% of their budget
  • TC
    The College of the Canyons Foundation
    4× · 2018–2025 · $387k · revenue +12%
  • NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $285k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • HM
    HENRY MAYO MANAGEMENT SERVICE ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • SC
    Santa Clarita Valley Committee On Aginggraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +54%
  • SC
    SANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $29k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
John Muir Health

The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.

Health
6
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
8
California Chronic Care Coalition

To improve the health care system where all Californians can access appropriate, affordable, quality health care through education and collaboration with all branches of government and key stakeholders to re-design a system of care

Human Services
9
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

Dedicated to improving the lives of people impacted by diabetes through research, education and care.

Health
10
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
National Health Council Inc

To provide a united voice for people with chronic diseases and disabilities.

—
12
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeast Valley Health Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Soroptimist International of Valencia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $19,837,799 · HealthHENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION+9 more: $408,334 · HealthWILLIAM S HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,459,706 · OtherWILLIAM S H…The College of the Canyons Foundation: $387,115 · OtherThe College…SANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC: $195,685 · OtherSANTA CLARI…ID ME PROMOTIONS: $114,871 · OtherHENRY MAYO MANAGEMENT SERVICE ORGANIZATION: $100,000 · Other+6 more: $93,374 · OtherBRIDGE TO HOME SCV: $264,129 · Community ImprovementSANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $28,600 · Community ImprovementSanta Clarita Valley Committee On Aging: $100,000 · Human ServicesSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF VALENCIA: $47,850 · PhilanthropyTriumph Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM S HART EDUCATION FOUNDATION WISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationFUTBOL FOUNDATION OF SANTA CLARITA: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$20,246,133Other$2,350,751Community Improvement$292,729Human Services$100,000Philanthropy$52,850Education$25,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $19,837,799 over 5y, 87% of budgetThe College of the Canyons Foundation: $387,115 over 4y, 13% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $284,800 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGE TO HOME SCV: $264,129 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetSanta Clarita Valley Committee On Aging: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF VALENCIA: $47,850 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $28,600 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetWILLIAM S HART EDUCATION FOUNDATION WISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUTBOL FOUNDATION OF SANTA CLARITA: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealthImpact: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChild & Family Center: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTriumph Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Community …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home