Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital

To be the most patient-centric hospital anywhere.

$7.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$314k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$20MRecreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$397kCommunity Improvement$254kHousing & Shelter$144kEmployment$105kHuman Services$100kPhilanthropy$36k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $430,925 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,999,132 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,568,207 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
  • $250k+1 grant · $314k
$23,847
Median grant
1
States reached
$629M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM S HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT$314,103
ID ME PROMOTIONS$33,935
SANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC$27,700
BRIDGE TO HOME SCV$23,847
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE$16,540
SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF VALENCIA$8,500
NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORP$6,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SCV SENIOR CENTER: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 14 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$22M
$311k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+29%

Still filing today

64%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The College of the Canyons Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $362k · revenue +12%
  • NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $285k · revenue +72%
  • BT
    BRIDGE TO HOME SCV
    6× · 2018–2024 · $215k · revenue +381%

Funded once

  • HM
    HENRY MAYO MANAGEMENT SERVICE ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • SC
    Santa Clarita Valley Committee On Aginggraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +54%
  • SC
    SANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $29k · revenue +51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
3
Hospital Council of N & C California

To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.

4
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
5
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
6
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
California Hospitals Committee on Issues

To participate in and educate the public about health issues and ballot proposition activity related to health issues or of concern to hospitals and health systems.

8
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
9
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
10
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
11
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

12
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $19,837,799 · HealthHENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION+8 more — $393,300 · HealthWILLIAM S HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT — $1,086,748 · OtherWILLIAM S…The College of the Canyons Foundation — $362,115 · OtherThe Colle…SANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC — $171,905 · OtherSANTA CLA…ID ME PROMOTIONS — $114,871 · OtherID ME PRO…HENRY MAYO MANAGEMENT SERVICE ORGANIZATION — $100,000 · Other+5 more — $87,325 · OtherBRIDGE TO HOME SCV — $214,679 · Community ImprovementSANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $28,600 · Community ImprovementSanta Clarita Valley Committee On Aging — $100,000 · Human ServicesSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF VALENCIA — $36,350 · PhilanthropyTriumph Foundation — $5,000 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM S HART EDUCATION FOUNDATION WISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationFUTBOL FOUNDATION OF SANTA CLARITA — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$20,231,099Other$1,922,964Community Improvement$243,279Human Services$100,000Philanthropy$41,350Education$25,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $19,837,799 over 5y, 87% of budgetThe College of the Canyons Foundation — $362,115 over 3y, 13% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION — $284,800 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGE TO HOME SCV — $214,679 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetSanta Clarita Valley Committee On Aging — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF VALENCIA — $36,350 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $28,600 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetWILLIAM S HART EDUCATION FOUNDATION WISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUTBOL FOUNDATION OF SANTA CLARITA — $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHealthImpact — $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChild & Family Center — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $5,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTriumph Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph