Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henry C and Audrienne Murray Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Henry C and Audrienne Murray Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Denver Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
7
’18
10
’19
6
’20
3
’21
2
’22
3
’23
2
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$632kReligion$74kEducation$16kArts & Culture$15kCommunity Improvement$11kHuman Services$9kRecreation & Sports$6kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$6,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$20,000
DENVER FOUNDATION$20,000
MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ST ANNE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$6,500
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$1,500
LES CHENEAUX CULINERY SCHOOL$1,000
GIVE KIDS THE WORLD VILLAGE$1,000
LES CHENEAUX YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREATER LOWELL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%WITNESS TO HOPE: $7k → 16%CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $5k → 12%DENVER FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%MAINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%GREATER LOWELL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $18k → 16%WITNESS TO HOPE: $6k → 16%DENVER FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%MAINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%GREATER LOWELL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%WITNESS TO HOPE: $5k → 16%PEWABIC POTTERY: $8k → 21%DENVER FOUNDATION: $19k → 12%MAINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18k → 11%GREATER LOWELL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18k → 8%LES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL: $7k → 14%DENVER FOUNDATION: $18k → 12%MAINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%GREATER LOWELL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%DENVER FOUNDATION: $18k → 12%GREATER LOWELL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 8%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%DENVER FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%GREATER LOWELL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $27k → 9%DENVER FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $23k → 14%LANSING CATHOLIC CENTRAL: $10k → 16%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18k → 9%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%LANSING CATHOLIC CENTRAL: $9k → 16%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18k → 9%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%LANSING CATHOLIC CENTRAL: $4k → 16%PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%PETOSKEY CLUB: $5k → 9%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF PETOSKEY CLUB: $5k → 9%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%ST ANNE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $7k → 14%MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 17 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
17

Total granted

$157k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+46%

Still filing today

47%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $12k · revenue +10%
  • MA
    MACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +33%
  • HI
    HIGHFIELDS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • PC
    PETOSKEY CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TC
    THE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue ×18
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
2
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
3
Michigan Credit Union Foundation

Cooperatively empowering credit unions to increase financial well-being by supporting community enrichment, financial education, and credit union development initiatives

Public Benefit
4
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
5
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
6
Lenawee Community Foundation

We connect people who care with causes that matter, bringing health, happiness, and hope to our community, now and forever.

Philanthropy
7
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
8
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
9
Charlevoix County Community Foundation

Awarding grants and scholarships.

Philanthropy
10
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
11
Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc

Mission statement: to gather, grow, and give endowed charitable financial resources to build stronger, more vibrant communities now and into the future.value statement:we are committed to managing our clients' philanthropic endowments in…

Philanthropy
12
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Denver Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Conscious Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $173,000 · PhilanthropyPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $120,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DENVER FOUNDATIONGreater Lowell Community Foundation Inc: $116,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Lowell Community Foundation IncMACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $111,990 · PhilanthropyMACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONMaine Community Foundation Inc: $73,000 · PhilanthropyMaine Community Foundation Inc+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $38,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE FO…LANSING CATHOLIC CENTRAL: $26,000 · OtherLANSING CATHOLIC CENTR…ST ANNE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $19,500 · OtherST ANNE'S CATHOLIC CHU…THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF THE DIOCESE OF LANSING: $18,000 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATIO…Individual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF PETOSKEY CLUB: $7,500 · OtherST VINCENT CATHOLIC CHARITY: $7,000 · Other+20 more: $28,850 · Other+20 moreLES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC: $11,500 · EducationGREAT LAKES BOAT BUILDING SCHOOL: $1,900 · EducationTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF CHICAGO INC: $6,140 · Community ImprovementVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Community ImprovementMACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $1,025 · Community ImprovementMACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL: $6,710 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $250 · Arts & CultureTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Food & NutritionELE'S PLACE INC: $1,500 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$594,490Other$152,850Education$13,400Community Improvement$11,665Arts & Culture$6,960Food & Nutrition$5,000Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $173,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Lowell Community Foundation Inc: $116,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $111,990 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetMaine Community Foundation Inc: $73,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC: $11,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL: $6,710 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF CHICAGO INC: $6,140 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHFIELDS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES BOAT BUILDING SCHOOL: $1,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $1,025 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Childrens Charities: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLes Cheneaux Yacht Club Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHINSDALE JUNIOR WOMAN'S CLUB: $300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DMC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGHFIELDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES BOAT BUILDING SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Childrens Charities ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Les Cheneaux Yacht Club Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE JUNIOR WOMAN'S CLUB ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles Stewart Mott FoundationMI15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry C and Audrienne Murray Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry C and Audrienne Murray Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Give Kids the World Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry C and Audrienne Murray’s filings →

More from the funding graph