Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henry B and Jessie W Keiser Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$508kArts & Culture$202kEducation$169kReligion$80kPhilanthropy$25kHousing & Shelter$17kCommunity Improvement$13kHuman Services$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,750
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$50,000
FRIENDS OF MACARTHUR BEACH STATE PARK INC$10,000
EPSILON EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT$10,000
NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART$10,000
WEEKS BRICK HOUSE$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,000
SCOTLAND AME ZION CHURCH$6,000
THE KENNEDY CENTER$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SMTD FUND$3,750
MARTHA COOK BUILDING ANNUAL FUND$3,000
MARTHA COOK BUILDING CAPITAL FUND$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
LAKESHORE LEGAL AID$2,500
THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 23 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
24

Total granted

$1.0M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+57%

Still filing today

52%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    9× · 2017–2025 · $505k · revenue +202%
  • NG
    National Gallery of Art
    8× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +57%
  • RH
    ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $65k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • MC
    MARTHA COOK HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
2
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
7
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies; the most unlike its peers is Inscape Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $505,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganEPSILON EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT: $50,000 · OtherEPSILON EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENTTHE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $50,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · Other+39 more: $211,500 · Other+39 moreNational Gallery of Art: $80,000 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery…ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureROUND HOUSE THEA…INSCAPE INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureINSCAPE INC+2 more: $9,500 · Arts & Culture+2 moreHIRAM COLLEGE: $43,000 · EducationBETHESDA COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $26,000 · EducationCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $11,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $15,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF MACARTHUR BEACH STATE PARK INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SAR FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 · PhilanthropyYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$849,000Arts & Culture$172,000Education$80,000Environment$25,500Philanthropy$21,500Human Services$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $505,000 over 9y, 23% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $43,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $26,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAR FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetINSCAPE INC: $17,500 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF MACARTHUR BEACH STATE PARK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA AND CHORALE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLakeshore Legal Aid: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds ROUND HOUSE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INSCAPE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MACARTHUR BEACH STATE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA AND CHORALE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arts and Humanities Council of MontgomerMD15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arts and Humanities Council of Montgomer · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry B and Jessie W Keiser Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry B and Jessie W Keiser Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Round House Theatre Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Henry B and Jessie W Keiser Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Henry B and Jessie W Keiser Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry B and Jessie W Keiser’s filings →

More from the funding graph