Skip to content
Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
131
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$13MHuman Services$9.2MScience & Tech$8.7MHealth$5.4MArts & Culture$5.2MPhilanthropy$4.2MInternational$2.8MCommunity Improvement$2.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 131 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k49 grants · $150k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $672k
  • $50k–250k47 grants · $4.5M
  • $250k+9 grants · $4.8M
$30,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$79M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$1,010,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION - ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$810,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NJ$601,800
THE PUBLIC THEATER$550,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$500,000
JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION$450,000
GERIATRIC SERVICES INC$306,500
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$270,000
PASSAIC COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$257,500
PATERSON EDUCATION FUND$200,000
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ$200,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY$178,000
BERGEN FAMILY CENTER$157,500
CITY GREEN INC$150,000
MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$147,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMECARE OPTIONS: $115k → 12%CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE: $65k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $120k → 16%THE PARTNERSHIP FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: $110k → 16%THE PARTNERSHIP FOR MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH: $105k → 16%CUMAC ECHO INC: $130k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $82k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $75k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $60k → 12%JEWISH HOME FAMILY: $450k → 7%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $60k → 12%JEWISH HOME FAMILY: $450k → 7%JEWISH HOME FAMILY: $450k → 7%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $60k → 12%JEWISH HOME FAMILY: $400k → 7%CHILDRENS DAY NURSERY AND FAMILY CENTER: $135k → 12%CHILDREN'S DAY NURSERY & FAMILY CTR: $113k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTONPASSAIC (JFS CLIFTON): $85k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTONPASSAIC (JFS CLIFTON): $85k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTONPASSAIC (JFS CLIFTON): $85k → 12%CHILDREN'S DAY NURSERY & FAMILY CTR: $75k → 12%CHILDREN'S DAY NURSERY & FAMILY CTR: $70k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTONPASSAIC (JFS CLIFTON): $70k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTONPASSAIC (JFS CLIFTON): $40k → 12%OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $95k → 12%OASIS -A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $95k → 12%OASIS -A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $78k → 12%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $222k → 7%OASIS -A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $55k → 12%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $211k → 7%OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $50k → 12%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $208k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $180k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $158k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $70k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES: $48k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES: $45k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $468k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $401k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $398k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $307k → 7%GERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $248k → 7%GREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $40k → 7%FAIR LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $75k → 7%FAIR LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $75k → 7%FAIR LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $65k → 7%FAIR LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $53k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 167 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

167 repeat relationships: 89 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

167
43

Total granted

$37M
$883k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+3%

Still filing today

68%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +4%
  • NY
    NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +29%
  • GS
    GERIATRIC SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SJ
    SAINT JOSEPH'S MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $130k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • I
    IDEOORG
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Independent Colleges and Universities of New Jersey a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of the independent colleges and universities of new jersey, a new jersey non-profit corporation is to advance the interests of new jersey's independent, non-profit, public mission institutions of higher education by promoting…

—
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Daughters of Miriam Center; the most unlike its peers is Living Yes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

178 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 178 of the 253 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
174/178
Grantees still filing
126/178
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY: $2,270,000 · OtherWILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITYPASSAIC COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,277,500 · OtherPASSAIC COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGEMETROPOLITAN OPERA: $1,160,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN OPERARUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $1,034,336 · OtherTHE PATERSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,020,000 · OtherCITY GREEN INC: $829,500 · Other+113 more: $13,360,648 · Other+113 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $8,415,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR T…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $2,650,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Jo…+6 more: $109,500 · InternationalGERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $1,820,250 · Human ServicesGERIATRIC SERVICE…THE JEWISH HOME FAMILY INC: $1,750,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH HOME F…CUMACECHO INC: $1,005,000 · Human ServicesCUMACECHO INCBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $978,000 · Human ServicesBERGEN FAMILY CEN…Children's Day Nursery and Family Center: $430,000 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $372,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTON-PASSAICINC: $365,000 · Human ServicesNEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $336,500 · Human ServicesFAIR LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $305,000 · Human Services+16 more: $1,195,900 · Human Services+16 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,043,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEE…University of Chicago: $400,000 · EducationUniversity …UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $331,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION INC: $226,000 · EducationEDUCATION LAW CENTER INC: $205,000 · Education+12 more: $794,375 · Education+12 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $3,333,400 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $400,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $378,000 · PhilanthropyENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $182,500 · Philanthropy+4 more: $65,000 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $2,280,000 · Arts & CultureBERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $843,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $102,400 · Arts & CulturePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $1,750,000 · HealthBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC: $145,000 · HealthTHE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $130,000 · HealthBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $130,000 · Health+11 more: $276,500 · Health
Other$20,951,984International$11,174,500Human Services$8,558,150Education$5,999,375Philanthropy$4,358,900Arts & Culture$3,225,400Health$2,431,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $8,415,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,043,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $3,333,400 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $2,650,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $2,280,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetGERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $1,820,250 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE JEWISH HOME FAMILY INC: $1,750,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $1,750,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PATERSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,020,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetCUMACECHO INC: $1,005,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $978,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetBERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $843,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCITY GREEN INC: $829,500 over 5y, 24% of budgetHAMILTON PARTNERSHIP FOR PATERSON INC: $662,500 over 5y, 35% of budgetNEW JERSEY FUTURE INC: $625,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $600,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPARAPROFESSIONAL HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $487,500 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetPATERSON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC SUBSIDIARY: $434,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetChildren's Day Nursery and Family Center: $430,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetJUSTICE IN AGING: $405,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $400,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $378,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS: $375,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $372,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTON-PASSAICINC: $365,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetNEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $336,500 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $331,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPASCACK VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $310,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetTHE PATERSON ALLIANCE INC: $305,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetFAIR LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $305,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $304,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC: $300,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $300,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPASSAIC COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $257,500 over 1y, 28% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE LAND TRUST INC: $230,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION INC: $226,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $215,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEDUCATION LAW CENTER INC: $205,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetNew Jersey Advocates for Aging Well Inc: $190,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetHome Care Options Inc: $190,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $190,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $182,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CITIZENS CAMPAIGN INC: $182,500 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $180,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNew Jersey Association for the Education of Young Children: $175,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $147,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds GERIATRIC SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH HOME FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PATERSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CUMACECHO INC ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON PARTNERSHIP FOR PATERSON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds PARAPROFESSIONAL HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATERSON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC SUBSIDIARY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Day Nursery and Family Center ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE IN AGING ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE & CHILDREN'S CENTER OF CLIFTON-PASSAICINC ↗
  • Who funds NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds PASCACK VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PATERSON ALLIANCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank Foundat…Community Foundation …Pseg Foundation IncThe Russell Berrie Fo…Turrell FundThe Provident Bank Fo…Investors Foundation …The Kaplen FoundationAlfred N Sanzari Fami…Lillian P Schenck Tw …The Burke Foundation …Blue Foundry Charitab…
Columbia Bank FoundationNJ66.3× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Pseg Foundation Inc · The Russell Berrie Foundation · Turrell Fund · The Provident Bank Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Kaplen Foundation · Alfred N Sanzari Family Foundation Inc · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · The Burke Foundation Inc · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 330%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • City Green Inc: 100% of income from government
  • 4CS of Passaic County Inc: 92% of income from government
  • Programs for Parents Inc: 92% of income from government
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Center for Hope and Safety Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Center for Family Resources Inc: 63% of income from government
  • Greater Bergen Community Action Inc: 62% of income from government
  • The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey: 43% of income from government
  • The Waterfront Project Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Child Focus Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Bergen Family Center: 25% of income from government
  • Cumacecho Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service & Children's Center of Clifton-Passaicinc: 19% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Liberty Science Center: 14% of income from government
  • Adler Aphasia Center: 12% of income from government
  • Hamilton Partnership for Paterson Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Memorial Day Nursery of Paterson Inc: 8% of income from government
  • New Jersey Future Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Center for Health Care Strategies Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Volunteer Center of Bergen County Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Arts Horizons Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
  • Bergen Performing Arts Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Children's Aid and Family Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Act Now Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Daughters of Miriam Center: 1% of income from government
  • New Jersey Audubon Society: 1% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Community School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
33get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
7rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 253 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry & Marilyn Taub’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home