Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$176k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MReligion$1.4MPublic Benefit$264kHousing & Shelter$118kHuman Services$83kEmployment$25kPhilanthropy$14kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $176k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Richard Nixon Foundation$176,378
Concordia University$20,000
Orange Lutheran High School$15,000
St John Lutheran Church$3,500
Conservative Partnership Institute$3,000
Field of Valor$2,500
Public Interest Legal Foundation$1,500
Hebrew Day School$1,000
US Justice Foundation$1,000
Election Fairness Institute$500
World War II Veterans Committee$500
Eisenhower Foundation$500
60 Plus Foundation$500
American Battlefield Trust$250
Truman Library Institute$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Graceworks: $500 → 14%Miss Washington Scholarship Organization: $1k → 9%The Kash Foundation: $100 → 9%Family Promise of Orange County: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OH
CA
UT
MO
VA
AZ
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 14 repeat orgs$905k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$3.4M
$895k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+31%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +62%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE
    4× · 2020–2025 · $515k · revenue +33%
  • TR
    THE RICHARD NIXON FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $241k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St John's Lutheran Church of Orange
    one grant, 2023 · $747k
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -23%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS GLOBAL
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Council of Institutional Investors

Educate/advocate for effective corporate governance and public company disclosure, strong shareholder rights and fair capital markets.

—
4
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
7
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
8
The Foundation for the Constitution

The Foundations Mission is to enhance our understanding of the Constitution and our constitutional history.

Social Science
9
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Field of Valor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $1,540,371 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITYCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $515,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE+4 more: $33,800 · EducationSt John's Lutheran Church of Orange: $747,331 · OtherSt John's Lutheran Church of OrangeSt John's Lutheran Church: $568,388 · OtherSt John's Lutheran ChurchConcordia University Foundation: $267,600 · OtherConcordia University FoundationTHE RICHARD NIXON FOUNDATION: $241,378 · OtherTHE RICHARD NIXON FOUNDATION+29 more: $212,950 · Other+29 moreFAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $100,000 · Human Services+3 more: $1,600 · Human ServicesSanta Ana Kiwanis Club Foundation: $36,000 · Community ImprovementField of Valor: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Foundation of Orange: $14,000 · PhilanthropyYOUTH CENTERS OF ORANGE INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$2,089,171Other$2,037,647Human Services$101,600Community Improvement$36,000Housing & Shelter$17,500Philanthropy$14,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $1,540,371 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $515,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RICHARD NIXON FOUNDATION: $241,378 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSanta Ana Kiwanis Club Foundation: $36,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS GLOBAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetField of Valor: $17,500 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Orange: $14,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMiss Washington Scholarship Organization: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 60 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELECTION FAIRNESS INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE ↗
  • Who funds THE RICHARD NIXON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Santa Ana Kiwanis Club Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds Field of Valor ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Orange ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH CENTERS OF ORANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Miss Washington Scholarship Organization ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Eisenhower Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE 60 PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Henley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Henley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph