Skip to content
Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$600k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.2MHuman Services$684kYouth Development$624kInternational$375kPhilanthropy$236kReligion$153kEmployment$120kCommunity Improvement$61kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $355k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $205k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST MARIN FUND$55,000
FIRST GRADUATE$50,000
NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH$50,000
SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY$50,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$45,000
COLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INC$45,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$44,750
ACADEMY PREP$40,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER$40,000
SACH-A MUNAY$35,000
SAKALA INTERNATIONAL$30,000
WHAT IF FOUNDATION$25,000
VERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN$20,000
URBAN CREATORS$10,000
LEARNING EMPOWERED$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $875k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $53k → 10%ELDER CARE COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $5k → 18%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $75k → 21%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $5k → 9%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $75k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $43k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $45k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
PA
CA
MO
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 29 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$3.7M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+2%

Still filing today

52%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GUADALUPE CENTERS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $295k · revenue +63%
  • FG
    FIRST GRADUATE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $260k · revenue +41%
  • WI
    What If Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MD
    MONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -26%
  • CE
    COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LAB INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -69%
  • WM
    West Marin Scholarship Program
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Enterprise Center Inc

West Enterprise Center, Inc.s mission is to educate and advocate for small businesses so that local entrepreneurs receive the information that they need to launch and expand their businesses.

Unclassified
2
Berkeley Community Scholars Dba Berkeley Community Fund

Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.

Philanthropy
3
Womens Center for Economic Opportunity

Our mission is to elevate & empower under-resourced business owners, leaders and innovators with pathways to the capital customers, contracts and connections needed to become financially secure

Education
4
First Community Capital Inc

First Community Capital, Inc. (FCCI) is a certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) dedicated to expanding access to affordable capital and technical assistance for small businesses and individuals, with a focus on low-…

Employment
5
Little Growers Inc

Empowers youth and communities to build a more resilient, equitable, and sustainable furture through hands-on education, workforce training, and nature based solutions.

Environment
6
Women Grow Foundation Inc

Community and education to build leadership, volunteerism among the next generation of cannabis industry leaders

Education
7
The California Center for Civic Participation

To educate california youth about the operations of local, state, and federal government.

Public Benefit
8
Nek Community Growth Center

Education of childcare workers

Education
9
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
10
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
11
Marcella Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Climate Resilient Communities

Climate Resilient Communities is empowering community voices to implement equitable climate solutions for unity, resilience, and justice.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Let's Grow Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is Making Waves Foundation Inc Aka Making Waves Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $304,000 · OtherSAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INC: $290,000 · OtherCOLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INCGLOBAL IMPACT: $235,850 · OtherGLOBAL IMPACTBIG BROTHER BIG SISTER: $210,000 · OtherBIG BROTHER BIG SISTERSACH-A MUNAY: $166,074 · OtherSACH-A MUNAYANTIOCH EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $165,000 · OtherANTIOCH EDUCATIONAL CENTERACADEMY PREP: $130,000 · OtherACADEMY PREPURBAN CREATORS: $130,000 · OtherURBAN CREATORS+17 more: $198,220 · Other+17 moreNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENTER: $350,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENT…GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $295,000 · Human ServicesGUADALUPE CENTERS INCWhat If Foundation: $220,200 · Human ServicesWhat If Foundation+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesFIRST GRADUATE: $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentLET'S GROW KIDS INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentORAL LEE BROWN FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE WEST MARIN FUND: $218,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyVERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC: $120,000 · Community ImprovementMONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementBolinas Community Inc: $8,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $2,500 · Community ImprovementSAKALA INTERNATIONAL: $155,000 · International
Other$1,829,144Human Services$875,200Youth Development$275,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Philanthropy$223,000Community Improvement$155,500International$155,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENTER: $350,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetGUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $295,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFIRST GRADUATE: $260,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetORAL LEE BROWN FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetWhat If Foundation: $220,200 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetTHE WEST MARIN FUND: $218,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSAKALA INTERNATIONAL: $155,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetURBAN CREATORS: $130,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetVERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC: $120,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LAB INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetLearning Empowered Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC AKA MAKING WAVES EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLET'S GROW KIDS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWest Marin Scholarship Program: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBLUFFTON SELF HELP INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LITERACY CENTER: $8,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBolinas Community Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFamfrequency Productions Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATALYST INITIATIVE: $2,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTHE CEDAR FOUNDATION: $1,220 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST GRADUATE ↗
  • Who funds ORAL LEE BROWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds What If Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE WEST MARIN FUND ↗
  • Who funds SAKALA INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds URBAN CREATORS ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds Learning Empowered Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC AKA MAKING WAVES EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LET'S GROW KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds West Marin Scholarship Program ↗
  • Who funds BLUFFTON SELF HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Bolinas Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds Famfrequency Productions Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDER CARE COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF FRANKLIN COUNTY FL INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE CEDAR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…The Vermont Community…S & C Harvest Foundat…Oakland Foundation IncThe San Francisco Fou…Ben & Jerry's Foundat…ImpactassetsincAmerican Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
Marin Community FoundationCA15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · S & C Harvest Foundation Inc · Oakland Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 84%
  • Capstone Community Action Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Vermont Works for Women Inc: 52% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27?

Find your warmest path to Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home