Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

S & C Harvest Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Arts & Culture$658kHuman Services$552kEducation$551kHealth$543kEnvironment$450kHousing & Shelter$382kPhilanthropy$152kEmployment$127kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $411k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN HALL THEATRE$100,000
CVUUS$50,000
ISLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY$50,000
ADDISON HOUSING WORKS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ELDERY SERVICES$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
PORTER MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
HOPE$20,000
STEP UP DURHAM$20,000
VT NATURE CONSERVANCY$20,000
GOOD SAMARATAN HAVEN$15,000
INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITI$15,000
CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $317k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 14%WOMENSAFE: $16k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $20k → 11%STEP UP DURHAM: $17k → 11%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $6k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $17k → 11%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $16k → 11%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $14k → 11%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $12k → 11%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $10k → 11%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%HANNAHS HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $3k → 11%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $15k → 9%STEP UP DURHAM: $3k → 11%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $15k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $10k → 9%WOMENSAFE: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $10k → 9%WOMENSAFE: $7k → 9%ELEVATE YOUTH SERVICES: $4k → 9%WOMENSAFE: $6k → 9%WOMENSAFE: $5k → 9%WOMENSAFE: $5k → 9%WOMENSAFE: $5k → 9%ATRIA COLLECTIVE: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
NY
MA
WY
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 89 repeat orgs$309k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

89 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

89
48

Total granted

$3.7M
$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+4%

Still filing today

47%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPUP DURHAM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +34%
  • INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • CC
    CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • MD
    MONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -26%
  • BC
    BARRE COMMUNITY RELIEF FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -100%
  • NC
    NORTH CALAIS MEMORIAL HALL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermont Electric Cooperative Inc

Vermont electric cooperative is a member owned not-for-profit whose mission is to provide safe, affordable, and reliable energy services to its members.

—
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
4
Vermont Land Trust Inc

Rooted in vermont since 1977, the vermont land trust unites land and lives for the enduring benefit of people and the place we share. we help people protect, care for, and connect to land. this includes the farms, forests, natural areas,…

Environment
5
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund Inc

We nurture the economic prosperity, ecological health, and social connectivity of people, businesses, organizations and communities in vermont for the benefit and well-being of all who live here.

Employment
11
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
12
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute for Sustainable Communities and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Addiction Recovery ServicesCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Women & Girls Leadership De…Domestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%5%<5yr12%3%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr20%33%20–35yr16%31%35–55yr17%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%2%<5yr12%7%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr20%22%20–35yr16%40%35–55yr17%24%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/71
the rest of the field
8%
489/6,038

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/66
Grantees still filing
48/66
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOWN HALL THEATRE — $430,500 · OtherTOWN HALL THEATRETHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $202,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCVUSS — $165,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $141,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $140,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $135,000 · OtherHOPE — $120,000 · OtherCHARTER HOUSE — $105,000 · Other+92 more — $1,672,229 · Other+92 moreSTEPUP DURHAM — $112,000 · Human ServicesCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesATRIA COLLECTIVE INC — $57,000 · Human ServicesHannah's House Inc — $41,000 · Human Services+3 more — $12,500 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY CENTER — $90,000 · EducationTrinity School Inc — $68,000 · EducationBucknell University — $26,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationDURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC — $22,000 · EducationEpiscopal Academy — $20,000 · EducationPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC — $20,000 · EducationLANDMARK SCHOOL INC — $12,000 · Education+4 more — $17,500 · EducationPORTER MEDICAL CENTER — $99,500 · HealthEL FUTURO INC — $43,000 · HealthSAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $20,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $7,500 · HealthCommunity Health Services of Addison Cty Inc — $7,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $7,000 · HealthINSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES — $100,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $19,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $14,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $5,000 · International+1 more — $3,000 · InternationalADDISON COUNTY COMMUNITY TRUST — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE — $33,500 · Housing & ShelterThe John W Graham Emergency Shelter and Service Inc — $7,000 · Housing & ShelterAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $16,500 · EnvironmentEcoForesters — $16,000 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $7,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentMiddlebury Area Land Trust — $3,500 · EnvironmentVERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC — $3,000 · Environment+1 more — $1,500 · Environment
Other$3,110,729Human Services$322,500Education$300,500Health$184,000International$141,000Housing & Shelter$90,500Environment$73,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $202,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPUP DURHAM — $112,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES — $100,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $100,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPORTER MEDICAL CENTER — $99,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY CENTER — $90,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTrinity School Inc — $68,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetATRIA COLLECTIVE INC — $57,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HAVEN INC — $52,250 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER INC CREDIT UNION — $52,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetADDISON COUNTY COMMUNITY TRUST — $50,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEL FUTURO INC — $43,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHannah's House Inc — $41,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetElderly Services Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE — $33,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetOPERA COMPANY OF MIDDLEBURY INC — $30,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetMONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $29,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES MOVING FORWARD — $27,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBucknell University — $26,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK — $24,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC — $22,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetEpiscopal Academy — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC — $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBARRE COMMUNITY RELIEF FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetREALITY MINISTRIES INC — $19,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $16,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEcoForesters — $16,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetVERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLET'S GROW KIDS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN DOOR SCHOLARS — $12,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLANDMARK SCHOOL INC — $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDismas of Vermont Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAMPBELL UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity Jubilee Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Services of Addison Cty Inc — $7,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe John W Graham Emergency Shelter and Service Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds STEPUP DURHAM ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTER MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Trinity School Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATRIA COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER INC CREDIT UNION ↗
  • Who funds ADDISON COUNTY COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds EL FUTURO INC ↗
  • Who funds Hannah's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Elderly Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE ↗
  • Who funds OPERA COMPANY OF MIDDLEBURY INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES MOVING FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…Ben & Jerry's Foundat…National Life Group C…Oakland Foundation IncFanny Allen Corporati…Richard E and Deborah…Triangle Community Fo…United Way of Addison…The Robert Fleming & …Duke University Healt…The Windham Foundatio…United Way of the Gre…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT49.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Oakland Foundation Inc · Fanny Allen Corporation · Richard E and Deborah L Tarrant Foundation Inc · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Addison County Inc · The Robert Fleming & Jane Howe Patrick Foundation Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · The Windham Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization S & C Harvest Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Institute for Sustainable Communities — 100% of income from government
  • Atria Collective Inc — 96% of income from government
  • Elevate Youth Services Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Capstone Community Action Inc — 84% of income from government
  • Good Samaritan Haven Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Vermont Works for Women Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc — 47% of income from government
  • Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Elderly Services Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Addison County Community Trust — 16% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
  • Hannah's House Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Middlebury Area Land Trust — 2% of income from government
  • Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
  • Simmons University — 1% of income from government
  • Washington County Mental Health Services Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Porter Medical Center — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 141 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines