Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$600k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.2MHuman Services$684kYouth Development$624kInternational$375kPhilanthropy$236kReligion$153kEmployment$120kCommunity Improvement$61kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $355k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $205k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST MARIN FUND$55,000
NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH$50,000
FIRST GRADUATE$50,000
SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY$50,000
COLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INC$45,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$45,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$44,750
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER$40,000
ACADEMY PREP$40,000
SACH-A MUNAY$35,000
SAKALA INTERNATIONAL$30,000
WHAT IF FOUNDATION$25,000
VERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN$20,000
URBAN CREATORS$10,000
LEARNING EMPOWERED$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $875k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $53k → 10%ELDER CARE COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $5k → 18%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $75k → 21%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $5k → 9%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $75k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $43k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $45k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH: $50k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
PA
CA
MO
SC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 29 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$3.7M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+2%

Still filing today

52%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GUADALUPE CENTERS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $295k · revenue +63%
  • FG
    FIRST GRADUATE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $260k · revenue +41%
  • WI
    What If Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MD
    MONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -26%
  • CE
    COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LAB INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -61%
  • WM
    West Marin Scholarship Program
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Enterprise Center Inc

West Enterprise Center, Inc.s mission is to educate and advocate for small businesses so that local entrepreneurs receive the information that they need to launch and expand their businesses.

Unclassified
2
Berkeley Community Scholars Dba Berkeley Community Fund

Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.

Philanthropy
3
Womens Center for Economic Opportunity

Our mission is to elevate & empower under-resourced business owners, leaders and innovators with pathways to the capital customers, contracts and connections needed to become financially secure

Education
4
First Community Capital Inc

First Community Capital, Inc. (FCCI) is a certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) dedicated to expanding access to affordable capital and technical assistance for small businesses and individuals, with a focus on low-…

Employment
5
Women Grow Foundation Inc

Community and education to build leadership, volunteerism among the next generation of cannabis industry leaders

Education
6
The California Center for Civic Participation

To educate california youth about the operations of local, state, and federal government.

Public Benefit
7
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

8
Vermont Community Loan Fund

Investing in people and communities to create a just and thriving vermont

Housing & Shelter
9
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

10
Urban Impact Initiative Massachusetts

Urban Impact is dedicated to prioritizing the reduction of the impact of poverty for families in the Commonwealth. The organization offers a plethora of small business corporate and community opportunities. These opportunities include…

Youth Development
11
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
12
Marcella Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Let's Grow Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Making Waves Foundation Inc Aka Making Waves Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Equity LeadershipLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Early Childhood Education C…Public University Foundatio…Senior Support ServicesPublic School District Foun…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Elementary Literacy TutoringCommunity Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%54%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY — $304,000 · OtherSAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INC — $290,000 · OtherCOLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INCGLOBAL IMPACT — $235,850 · OtherGLOBAL IMPACTBIG BROTHER BIG SISTER — $210,000 · OtherBIG BROTHER BIG SISTERSACH-A MUNAY — $166,074 · OtherSACH-A MUNAYANTIOCH EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $165,000 · OtherANTIOCH EDUCATIONAL CENTERACADEMY PREP — $130,000 · OtherACADEMY PREPURBAN CREATORS — $130,000 · OtherURBAN CREATORS+17 more — $198,220 · Other+17 moreNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENTER — $350,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENT…GUADALUPE CENTERS INC — $295,000 · Human ServicesGUADALUPE CENTERS INCWhat If Foundation — $220,200 · Human ServicesWhat If Foundation+2 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesFIRST GRADUATE — $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentLET'S GROW KIDS INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentORAL LEE BROWN FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE WEST MARIN FUND — $218,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyVERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC — $120,000 · Community ImprovementMONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementBolinas Community Inc — $8,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $2,500 · Community ImprovementSAKALA INTERNATIONAL — $155,000 · International
Other$1,829,144Human Services$875,200Youth Development$275,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Philanthropy$223,000Community Improvement$155,500International$155,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENTER — $350,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetGUADALUPE CENTERS INC — $295,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFIRST GRADUATE — $260,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetORAL LEE BROWN FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetWhat If Foundation — $220,200 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetTHE WEST MARIN FUND — $218,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSAKALA INTERNATIONAL — $155,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetURBAN CREATORS — $130,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetVERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC — $120,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LAB INC — $20,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetMAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC AKA MAKING WAVES EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Empowered Inc — $18,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLET'S GROW KIDS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWest Marin Scholarship Program — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE LITERACY CENTER — $8,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBLUFFTON SELF HELP INC — $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBolinas Community Inc — $8,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFamfrequency Productions Inc — $5,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCATALYST INITIATIVE — $2,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTHE CEDAR FOUNDATION — $1,220 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CENTER
  • Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC
  • Who funds FIRST GRADUATE
  • Who funds ORAL LEE BROWN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds What If Foundation
  • Who funds THE WEST MARIN FUND
  • Who funds SAKALA INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds URBAN CREATORS
  • Who funds VERMONT WORKS FOR WOMEN INC
  • Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc
  • Who funds MONTPELIER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ASSOC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LAB INC
  • Who funds MAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC AKA MAKING WAVES EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Learning Empowered Inc
  • Who funds LET'S GROW KIDS INC
  • Who funds West Marin Scholarship Program
  • Who funds THE LITERACY CENTER
  • Who funds BLUFFTON SELF HELP INC
  • Who funds Bolinas Community Inc
  • Who funds Famfrequency Productions Inc
  • Who funds CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC
  • Who funds ELDER CARE COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF FRANKLIN COUNTY FL INC
  • Who funds WEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds CATALYST INITIATIVE
  • Who funds THE CEDAR FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · S & C Harvest Foundation Inc · Oakland Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 84%
  • Capstone Community Action Inc84% of income from government
  • Vermont Works for Women Inc52% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27?

Find your warmest path to Hendrickson Family Foundation Uad April 27 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph