Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helppie Family Charitable Foundtn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$683kRecreation & Sports$653kEducation$294kReligion$191kArts & Culture$72kPhilanthropy$43kHuman Services$41kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$250
Median grant
9
States reached
$686k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GUIDANCE CENTER$110,000
EISENHOWER HEALTH FOUNDATION$16,280
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$11,375
FAIRHAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH$2,400
PURPLE ROSE THEATER$2,000
ESCOT YOUTH DEVELOPMENT$1,021
CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS$1,000
BETTIE D GONZALEZ FNDTN OF HOP$1,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH$550
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$518
WORLDWIDE INDIGENOUS SCIENCE NETWOR$500
HEALTHNET FOUNDATION$500
T WALL FOUNDATION$310
LUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES$309
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BETTIE D GONZALEZ FNDTN OF HOP: $1k → 11%THE A SCOTT FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DAVIS DIRECTION FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%BETTIE D GONZALEZ FNDTN OF HOP: $1k → 11%BETTIE D GONZALEZ FNDTN OF HOP: $300 → 11%T WALL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%T WALL FOUNDATION: $310 → 14%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $11k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 8%T WALL FOUNDATION: $309 → 14%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $518 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $518 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $518 → 8%FAITH IN ACTION: $103 → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 21%LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $200 → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $105 → 8%ANGELA HOSPICE: $515 → 21%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $200 → 21%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $103 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
MA
OR
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Helppie Family Charitable Foundtn’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 65%.

Helppie Family Charitable Foundtnlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 32 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
38

Total granted

$1.9M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+15%

Still filing today

44%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GUIDANCE CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $440k · revenue +45%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH MERCY CHELSEA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $128k · revenue +29%
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $16k · revenue +70%
  • TH
    TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGANgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +33%
  • TP
    THE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
2
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

—
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
9
Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan

Centrica meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
10
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation

Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…

Health
11
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
12
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The a Scott Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
25/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAMPIONS OF WAYNE INC: $652,500 · OtherCHAMPIONS OF WAYNE INCCRANBROOK: $184,900 · OtherCRANBROOKOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH: $146,152 · OtherOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCHCRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $75,000 · OtherCRANBROOK SCHOOLSPURPLE ROSE THEATER: $58,910 · OtherEISENHOWER HEALTH FOUNDATION: $48,840 · Other+45 more: $146,900 · Other+45 moreTHE GUIDANCE CENTER: $439,766 · HealthTHE GUIDANCE CENTERST JOSEPH MERCY CHELSEA INC: $128,000 · HealthST JOSEPH MERCY CHELSEA INC+9 more: $31,275 · HealthLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $34,389 · Human ServicesTHE A SCOTT FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesBETTIE D GONZALEZ FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $2,330 · Human ServicesT WALL FOUNDATION: $1,619 · Human Services+6 more: $2,749 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION: $17,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $9,100 · EducationTHE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY: $10,504 · Arts & CultureWORLDWIDE INDIGENOUS SCIENCE NETWORK: $4,500 · Arts & CultureCANYONLANDS FIELD INSTITUTE INC: $1,200 · Arts & CultureESCOT YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,521 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $150 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $103 · Recreation & SportsFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,753 · International
Other$1,313,202Health$599,041Human Services$44,087Education$26,600Arts & Culture$16,204Recreation & Sports$1,774International$1,753

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAMPIONS OF WAYNE INC: $652,500 over 4y, 74% of budgetTHE GUIDANCE CENTER: $439,766 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetST JOSEPH MERCY CHELSEA INC: $128,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $34,389 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION: $17,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $16,280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY: $10,504 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $9,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDWIDE INDIGENOUS SCIENCE NETWORK: $4,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE A SCOTT FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetBETTIE D GONZALEZ FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $2,330 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,753 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetT WALL FOUNDATION: $1,619 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetESCOT YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,521 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCANYONLANDS FIELD INSTITUTE INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $1,039 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS DIRECTION FOUNDATION: $1,023 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $605 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNET FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $413 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMethodist Children's Home Society: $303 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $256 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $253 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAMPIONS OF WAYNE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH MERCY CHELSEA INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THE PURPLE ROSE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE INDIGENOUS SCIENCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE A SCOTT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETTIE D GONZALEZ FOUNDATION OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds T WALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ESCOT YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CANYONLANDS FIELD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS DIRECTION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI30.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Ford Philanthropy · DTE Energy Foundation · The Carls Foundation · Orsa Foundation · Eagles for Children · Ethel and James Flinn Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Comerica Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helppie Family Charitable Foundtn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helppie Family Charitable Foundtn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Helppie Family Charitable Foundtn?

Find your warmest path to Helppie Family Charitable Foundtn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helppie Family Charitable Foundtn’s filings →

More from the funding graph