Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Eagles for Children

EAGLES FOR CHILDREN is a nonprofit organization committed to supporting local charities for disadvantaged youth through partnerships with golf clubs.

$923k
Granted FY2021
70
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.

Human Services$502kHealth$453kYouth Development$436kEducation$233kFood & Nutrition$118kRecreation & Sports$107kPhilanthropy$104kHousing & Shelter$86kOther$0
02FY2021 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 70 grants below total $759,269 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $922,648 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $163,379 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k40 grants · $315k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $444k
$9,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION$27,000
NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES$26,000
CAMP CASEY$25,621
GIRLS MATTER SURVIVING THE SOCIAL JUNGLE$22,596
VARIETY$22,000
GENESIS THE CHURCH$21,000
Individual grant recipient$19,500
METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$18,700
Individual grant recipient$18,387
LOST VOICES$15,000
GIFTS FOR ALL GOD'S CHILDREN$14,806
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE DETROIT$14,700
MITTENS FOR DETROIT INC$12,500
HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE$12,500
BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST$12,068
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MITTENS FOR DETROIT INC: $13k → 8%SKYLINE CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER: $3k → 10%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $16k → 15%MITTENS FOR DETROIT INC: $9k → 8%BOOT FOR KIDS: $10k → 10%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $16k → 15%MITTENS FOR DETROIT INC: $5k → 8%CLEAN LOVE PROJECT: $2k → 21%SAMARITAS: $10k → 21%SAMARITAS: $10k → 21%SAMARITAS: $5k → 21%OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 8%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE OF DETROIT: $12k → 21%OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 8%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $7k → 21%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $13k → 8%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $27k → 21%EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%THE EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 21%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $19k → 21%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $9k → 21%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $7k → 21%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $5k → 21%HIGHER HOPES: $10k → 8%GIVING SONGS: $11k → 8%NAMI METRO: $9k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $30k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $26k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $24k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $18k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $17k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $13k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $12k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $12k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $11k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $8k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $8k → 8%YATOOMA'S FOUNDATION FOR THE KIDS INC: $5k → 8%MITTENS FOR DETROIT INC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Eagles for Children’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Eagles for Childrenlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 63 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

63 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2021, 12 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
33

Total granted

$1.8M
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $186k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAMP CASEY CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $97k · revenue +82%
  • JC
    JUDSON CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +20%
  • GF
    GIFTS FOR ALL GODS CHILDREN
    4× · 2018–2021 · $43k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • LO
    LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND CO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k
  • SR
    SOUTH REDFORD FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k
  • GP
    GRACE & PEACE COMMUNITY CHURCHLEAP INTO LEARNING
    one grant, 2020 · $16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association for Children's Mental Health

To ensure all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges and their families live in a safe, welcoming community with access to needed services and supports.

Health
2
Detroit Parent Network

To be a champion for parents of children in the community.

Human Services
3
Detroit Institute for Children

We empower children to overcome challenges.

Health
4
Michigan Foster Care Closet

Provide support, services and aid to current, future and past foster, adoptive and relative parents who are or were in the foster care system.

Human Services
5
Michigan's Children

To ensure that policymakers prioritize the needs of the most challenged children from cradle to career.

Human Services
6
The Youth Connection Inc

The Youth Connection is committed to connecting all youth and their families in metro Detroit to a brighter future by providing quality programs and supportive services.

Youth Development
7
Michigan Casa Inc

Michigan casa, inc. is dedicated to changing the lives of abused and neglected children by advocating for their best interests through establishing, supporting, and expanding quality casa programs throughout the state of michigan to ensure…

Civil Rights
8
Community Pride Mi
Public Benefit
9
Friends of the Children - Detroit

Friends of the children - detroit has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
10
Growing Hope Through Love

Growing hope through love is organized as a child welfare agency that maintains a child placing agency license through the department of child welfare licensing and contracts with michigan department of health and human services to license…

Human Services
11
Youth Haven Inc

To help disadvantaged youth transform their lives by providing learning experiences in a fun and safe christian environment, free of charge.

—
12
Detroit Donates Inc
Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rainbow Connection and the most unlike its peers is Wish Upon a Teen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPerforming Arts EducationFaith-Based Community Servi…Youth Development ProgramsJewish Community ServicesResidential Support ServicesMichigan Grantmaking Founda…Family Philanthropic Founda…Detroit Community Developme…Michigan Advocacy and Devel…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%4%<5yr15%12%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%3%<5yr15%7%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr13%19%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/83
the rest of the field
17%
2,883/16,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
52/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIETY — $69,700 · OtherVARIETYIndividual grant recipient — $59,506 · OtherGENESIS THE CHURCH — $54,500 · OtherGIRLS MATTER SURVIVING THE SOCIAL JUNGLE — $48,426 · OtherFIRST STEP — $47,730 · OtherGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE DETROIT — $41,200 · Other+61 more — $837,954 · Other+61 moreCAMP CASEY CORPORATION — $96,866 · Human ServicesCAMP CASEY CORPORATIONJUDSON CENTER INC — $49,500 · Human ServicesJUDSON CENTER INCEMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION — $42,000 · Human ServicesEMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDA…CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $40,518 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE MICHIGANMethodist Children's Home Society — $39,700 · Human ServicesMethodist Children's Hom…MITTENS FOR DETROIT INC — $31,987 · Human ServicesMITTENS FOR DETROIT INCBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $31,500 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK …SAMARITAS — $25,000 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT INC — $22,788 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT — $18,692 · Human Services+10 more — $84,083 · Human Services+10 moreBUILDING BRIDGES — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM — $25,826 · Youth DevelopmentBRILLIANT DETROIT — $24,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC — $22,418 · Youth DevelopmentWISH UPON A TEEN — $17,192 · Youth DevelopmentFREE BIKES 4 KIDZ - DETROIT — $15,996 · Youth DevelopmentLOST VOICES — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentYouth for Christ of Detroit — $9,043 · Youth Development+2 more — $7,775 · Youth DevelopmentTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES — $33,000 · HealthTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION — $32,600 · HealthCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $26,303 · HealthCourageous Kids Inc — $13,500 · HealthAUTISM ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN — $8,180 · HealthCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CHAR-EM INC — $5,000 · HealthTHE LUKE CLINIC — $5,000 · HealthBRIDGEPOINTE INC — $42,795 · EducationMath Corps — $26,218 · EducationOFFERING ALTERNATIVE THERAPY WITH SMILES — $24,695 · EducationCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION — $12,500 · EducationBEYOND BASICS — $8,143 · EducationMIRACLE LEAGUE OF PLYMOUTH INC — $32,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH OAKLAND SCAMP FUNDING CORP — $23,481 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM — $21,250 · Recreation & SportsHIGH 5IVE-THE DREW STANTON FOUNDATION INC — $8,500 · Recreation & SportsDETROIT GOLF FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Recreation & SportsGIFTS FOR ALL GODS CHILDREN — $42,806 · PhilanthropyTED LINDSAY FOUNDATION — $38,720 · Philanthropy
Other$1,159,016Human Services$482,634Youth Development$167,750Health$123,583Education$114,351Recreation & Sports$93,231Philanthropy$81,526

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP CASEY CORPORATION — $96,866 over 5y, 10% of budgetJUDSON CENTER INC — $49,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIFTS FOR ALL GODS CHILDREN — $42,806 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetBRIDGEPOINTE INC — $42,795 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetEMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION — $42,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $40,518 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMethodist Children's Home Society — $39,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTED LINDSAY FOUNDATION — $38,720 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetFAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS — $36,018 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetVISTA MARIA — $33,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES — $33,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION — $32,600 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF PLYMOUTH INC — $32,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetMITTENS FOR DETROIT INC — $31,987 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $31,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES — $30,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetKids Coalition Against Hunger — $27,514 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetLIFE REMODELED — $27,296 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $26,303 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMath Corps — $26,218 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT — $26,045 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM — $25,826 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAS — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOFFERING ALTERNATIVE THERAPY WITH SMILES — $24,695 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT — $24,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC — $24,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH OAKLAND SCAMP FUNDING CORP — $23,481 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetTURNING POINT INC — $22,788 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC — $22,418 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM — $21,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT — $18,692 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWISH UPON A TEEN — $17,192 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TROY — $17,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNICATION IS KEY AAC — $16,700 over 2y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC — $16,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREE BIKES 4 KIDZ - DETROIT — $15,996 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetLOST VOICES — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCourageous Kids Inc — $13,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetSOUTH LYON AREA YOUTH ASSISTANCE — $13,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION — $12,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $12,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES — $11,814 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIVING SONGS INC — $10,500 over 1y, 19% of budgetHIGHER HOPES — $10,439 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHumble Design Inc — $10,125 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUSIE QS KIDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetBOOTS FOR KIDS — $10,000 over 1y, 22% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP CASEY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIFTS FOR ALL GODS CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPOINTE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMILY ANN GRIFFIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Methodist Children's Home Society ↗
  • Who funds TED LINDSAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds THE RAINBOW CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF PLYMOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds MITTENS FOR DETROIT INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES ↗
  • Who funds Kids Coalition Against Hunger ↗
  • Who funds LIFE REMODELED ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Math Corps ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAS ↗
  • Who funds OFFERING ALTERNATIVE THERAPY WITH SMILES ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH OAKLAND SCAMP FUNDING CORP ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canton Community Foun…Community Foundation …Dte Energy FoundationUnited Way for Southe…The Carls FoundationChildren's Hospital o…The Barton Malow Foun…Phillip and Elizabeth…Michigan Health Endow…Deroy Testamentary Fo…Helen L Kay Charitabl…Detroit Industrial Sc…
Canton Community Foundation IncMI110.8× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canton Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Carls Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · The Barton Malow Foundation · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Deroy Testamentary Foundation · Helen L Kay Charitable Trust · Detroit Industrial School

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eagles for Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home