Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen John Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$100kHealth$84kReligion$40kAnimals$19kCrime & Legal$5kArts & Culture$1kInternational$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$2,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$752k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOISE STATE FOUNDATION$19,415
ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON$7,500
PORTLAND DACHSHUND RESCUE$3,000
OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$2,800
ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL$2,800
Individual grant recipient$2,800
ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,800
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$2,800
IDAHO WOMEN'S CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$1,125
HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%BOISE STATE FOUNDATION: $19k → 8%HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FBO BRIDIG LEAKE: $9k → 8%ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 8%ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 8%HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%ST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 10%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 10%HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 10%HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 10%THE JESUITS: $3k → 12%THE JESUITS: $3k → 12%THE JESUITS: $3k → 12%THE ALS ASSOCIATION OREGON & SW WASHINGTON CHAPTER: $15k → 12%THE ALS ASSOCIATION OREGON & SW WASHINGTON CHAPTER: $15k → 12%ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON: $15k → 12%ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON: $15k → 12%ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON: $10k → 12%ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON: $10k → 12%ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON: $8k → 12%ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Helen John Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Helen John Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$287k · 19 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$287k
$11k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    ALS Northwest
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +61%
  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +42%
  • OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FBO BRIDIG LEAKE
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • IC
    IDAHO CENTER FOR FISCAL POLICY
    one grant, 2019 · $600
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
    one grant, 2019 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
2
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
3
Spokane Humane Society

The vision of Spokane Humane Society is to enrich the lives of animals and their companions through Support, Education, Advocacy and Love (SEAL). As the oldest local non-profit in Spokane, we have been serving companion animals in need and…

Animals
4
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
5
Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

Crime & Legal
6
Oregon Dog Rescue

Conduct rescue of dogs, facilitate adoptions of same. provide emergency vet services for dogs needing rescue

Animals
7
Idaho Law Foundation Inc

The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…

—
8
Dove Lewis Emergency Animal Hospital Inc

Founded in 1973, dove lewis emergency animal hospital, inc. (dovelewis) is one of the premier veterinary medical service organizations in the us and the only 24/7 not-for-profit animal emergency, critical care, and specialty hospital in…

Animals
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
11
Willamette Animal Guild

To reduce animal cruelty and suffering, with emphasis on providing low-cost spay/neuter and wellness services. Specifically, WAGs goal is to reduce pet overpopulation through our high-quality, high-volume, low-cost spay/neuter clinic in…

Animals
12
Dane County Humane Society

Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Humanities Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Portland Dachshund Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTON: $61,759 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION OF OR AND SW WASHINGTONBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,934 · OtherBOISE STATE UNIVERSITYHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $23,600 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOLST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $22,100 · OtherST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOLST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20,600 · OtherST PIUS CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $20,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOISE STATE FOUNDATION: $19,915 · OtherBOISE STATE FOUNDATIONBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FBO BRIDIG LEAKE: $9,148 · Other+9 more: $16,700 · Other+9 moreALS Northwest: $30,000 · HealthALS Northwe…OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,250 · AnimalsOREGON HU…PORTLAND DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $4,000 · AnimalsPORTLAND …Idaho Humane Society Inc: $4,000 · AnimalsIdaho Hum…CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $20,100 · EducationST ANDREW LEGAL CLINIC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalIDAHO WOMENS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,125 · PhilanthropyIDAHO HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · International
Other$217,856Health$30,000Animals$24,250Education$20,100Crime & Legal$5,000Philanthropy$2,125Arts & Culture$1,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALS Northwest: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $20,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREW LEGAL CLINIC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPORTLAND DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO WOMENS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,125 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALS Northwest ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREW LEGAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND DACHSHUND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO WOMENS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helen John Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen John Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • St Andrew Legal Clinic: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helen John’s filings →

More from the funding graph