Skip to content

Oregon · Private foundation

Helen John Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
13%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,800
Largest grant, FY2025
$19,415
Organizations funded a year
8 to 14
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$752k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 13% of the organizations Helen John Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$48k10%
FY20248$28k13%
FY20238$31k0%
FY20229$23k0%
FY202110$37k0%
FY202014$43k36%
FY201910$14k60%
FY201811$33k0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$100kHealth$84kReligion$40kAnimals$19kCrime & Legal$5kArts & Culture$1kInternational$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
ALS Northwest$30,00021%
St Andrew Nativity School$22,1009n/a
Corporation of Gonzaga University$20,10090%
Oregon Humane Society$16,25080%
St Andrew Legal Clinic$5,00040%
Portland Dachshund Rescue Inc$4,00022%
Idaho Humane Society Inc$4,00020%
Lake Oswego School District Foundation Inc$2,50020%
Idaho Humanities Council Inc$1,00020%
Medecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc$1,00020%

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($193k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Helen John Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALS Northwest: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCorporation of Gonzaga University: $20,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOregon Humane Society: $16,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSt Andrew Legal Clinic: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPortland Dachshund Rescue Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLake Oswego School District Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIdaho Humanities Council Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Helen John Foundation with peer funders

About Helen John Foundation

How much does Helen John Foundation give?
Helen John Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $49,040 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 14 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Helen John Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (40%), Health (33%), Religion (16%).
Who are Helen John Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: ALS Northwest ($30k), St Andrew Nativity School ($22k), Corporation of Gonzaga University ($20k).
Does Helen John Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 13% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Helen John Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Helen John Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Oregon Community Foundation, The Blackbaud Giving Fund, Network for Good.
Where is Helen John Foundation based?
Helen John Foundation is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helen John’s filings →

More from the funding graph