Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hei Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$488kYouth Development$304kEducation$45kHuman Services$45kPublic Benefit$40kSocial Science$5kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$968k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$45,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$20,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$15,000
MISERICORDIA$15,000
MOOSEHEART$5,000
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS$5,000
GLENWOOD ACADEMY$5,000
ALIVE CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS: $8k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS: $8k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS: $5k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS: $5k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS: $5k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-ILLINOIS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$903k · 13 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$903k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+223%

Still filing today

46%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    OFF THE STREET CLUB
    7× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +161%
  • OF
    ONE FAMILY ILLINOIS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +49%
  • AC
    ALIVE CENTER NFP
    5× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • PT
    PATHWAY TO ADVENTURE COUNCIL SCOUTING AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • SM
    ST MICHAELS YOUTH PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • BN
    BISHOP NOLL INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Students Run Chicago
Health
2
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
3
Chicago Collegiate Inc

To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.

Education
4
Lycee Francais de Chicago Inc

The Lycee Francais de Chicago, driven by our core values of respect, responsibility and the joy of learning, empowers students to grow into active global citizens.

Education
5
Girls in the Game Nfp

At girls in the game nfp, every girl finds her voice, discovers her strength and leads with confidence through fun and active sports, health and leadership programs.

Unclassified
6
Junior Achievement of Central Illinois Inc

Junior Achievement of Central Illinois inspires and prepares young people to succeed in the global economy. Our volunteer-delivered, experiential programs give students knowledge and skills in financial literacy, work readiness and…

International
7
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
8
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
9
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
10
Hope Ignites Chicago

Boys Hope Girls Hope nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others through its holistic, long-term residential and academy programming. The organization provides direct…

—
11
One for One Chicago

One for one chicago provides paid work-based learning, mentorship, and career readiness support for young people ages 1524 in chicago communities with high rates of unemployment and limited access to early work experience.

Youth Development
12
Chicago Chess Foundation

We provide all Chicago youth with equitable access to chess education empowering them with essential life skills for success on and off the board.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Link Unlimited Scholars; the most unlike its peers is The Miracle League of Joliet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISERICORDIA: $105,000 · OtherMISERICORDIABOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $85,852 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICALURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $80,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALADVOCATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $58,004 · OtherADVOCATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALMOOSEHEART: $40,000 · OtherMOOSEHEARTLURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION+6 more: $30,946 · Other+6 moreADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $195,000 · HealthADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDA…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARC…OFF THE STREET CLUB: $180,000 · Youth DevelopmentOFF THE STREET CLUBALIVE CENTER NFP: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentALIVE CENTER NFPONE FAMILY ILLINOIS: $45,000 · Human ServicesGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $29,000 · EducationLINK Unlimited Scholars: $4,500 · EducationThe Miracle League of Joliet: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$429,802Health$215,000Youth Development$205,000Human Services$45,000Education$33,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOFF THE STREET CLUB: $180,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetONE FAMILY ILLINOIS: $45,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $29,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALIVE CENTER NFP: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLINK Unlimited Scholars: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OFF THE STREET CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ONE FAMILY ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE CENTER NFP ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LINK Unlimited Scholars ↗
  • Who funds The Miracle League of Joliet ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC14.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Carol Bernick Family Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hei Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hei Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hei’s filings →

    More from the funding graph