Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heather & Don Stone Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2026still arriving
4
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2026.

Religion$118kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$4kCrime & Legal$3kInternational$3kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$100Recreation & Sports$100Other$0
02FY2026 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $300
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$100
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH$29,885
UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION$100
LIGONIER MINISTRIES$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 12% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NAVIGATORS: $1k → 12%STREETS OF HOPE: $1k → 9%BLANCHE SPRENTZ PTO: $300 → 12%UTAH PARTNERSHIP FOR CHRIST: $500 → 9%UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION: $300 → 10%ACTION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $300 → 9%GOOD NEWS JAIL & PRISON MINISTRY: $500 → 9%MACULAR DEGNERATION RESEARCH: $400 → 8%NAVIGATORS: $1k → 12%STREETS OF HOPE: $1k → 9%BLANCHE SPRENTZ PTO: $300 → 12%UTAH PARTNERSHIP FOR CHRIST: $500 → 9%UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION: $200 → 10%GOOD NEWS JAIL: $500 → 9%MACULAR DEGNERATION RESEARCH: $400 → 8%NAVIGATORS: $1k → 12%BLANCHE SPRENTZ PTO: $200 → 12%UTAH PARTNERSHIP FOR CHRIST: $500 → 9%UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION: $200 → 10%GOOD NEWS JAIL & PRISON MINISTRY: $500 → 9%MACULAR DEGNERATION RESEARCH: $400 → 8%NAVIGATORS: $1k → 12%CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF UT: $800 → 8%UTAH PARTNERSHIP FOR CHRIST: $300 → 9%UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION: $200 → 10%GOOD NEWS JAIL & PRISON MINISTRY: $500 → 9%MACULAR DEGNERATION RESEARCH: $400 → 8%NAVIGATORS: $1k → 12%CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF UT: $300 → 8%UTAH PARTNERSHIP FOR CHRIST: $300 → 9%UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION: $200 → 10%GOOD NEWS JAIL & PRISON MINISTRY: $300 → 9%NAVIGATORS: $1k → 12%CEF UTAH: $200 → 8%GOOD NEWS JAIL & PRISON MINISTRY: $300 → 9%INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $30k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $15k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $14k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $14k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $14k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $13k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $13k → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $800 → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $800 → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $800 → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $600 → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
PA
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 20 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
13

Total granted

$145k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+3%

Still filing today

35%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +9%
  • UP
    Utah Partnerships for Christ Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +196%
  • US
    UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION IN
    7× · 2020–2026 · $1k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • AI
    ACTION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $300
  • TL
    THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPNOMA SOC
    one grant, 2022 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
3
Utah Geological Foundation
—
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
6
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
9
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
10
Courage for Life Incorporated

Organization's mission: courage for life exists to encourage individuals to embrace their god-given courage for life. we create emotional health, spiritual growth, and bible study resources to disciple individuals to grow in their…

Human Services
11
Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's purse is a nondenominational evangelical christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. since 1970, samaritan's purse has helped meet the needs of people who are victims of war,…

Religion
12
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Partnerships for Christ Inc; the most unlike its peers is Streets of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $113,725 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN BAPTIST CHURCHTHE NAVIGATORS: $7,200 · Other+22 more: $16,950 · Other+22 moreRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $3,800 · Human ServicesUtah Partnerships for Christ Inc: $2,100 · ReligionLigonier Ministries Inc: $350 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $275 · ReligionAmerican Heart Association Inc: $600 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $300 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $275 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthUTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION IN: $1,250 · Crime & Legal
Other$137,875Human Services$3,800Religion$2,725Health$1,275Crime & Legal$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $3,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETS OF HOPE: $2,400 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUtah Partnerships for Christ Inc: $2,100 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION IN: $1,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC: $1,100 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $275 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $275 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Utah Partnerships for Christ Inc ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION IN ↗
  • Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ligonier Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heather & Don Stone Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heather & Don Stone Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heather & Don Stone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph