Skip to content
Heartbeat International Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Heartbeat International Inc

Heartbeat international's life-saving mission is to reach and rescue as many lives as possible, around the world, through an effective network of life-affirming pregnancy help to renew communities for life.

$689k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Public Benefit$533kHealth$161kHuman Services$65kReligion$37k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $69,932, the rows itemized in this filing. The $688,541 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $618,609 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$7,357
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC LAKELAND$19,200
ASCEND WOMEN'S CENTER$17,600
ASHE CPC OF JEFFERSON$8,000
MARY'S SHELTER$7,357
EVERYLIFE INC$6,920
CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC$5,600
PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER SOUTHSIDE VA$5,255
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARMS OF GRACE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 13%LIFE CHOICE PC OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $15k → 14%PREGNANCY CARE AND HOPE CENTER: $15k → 18%MARY'S SHELTER INC: $7k → 15%MARY'S SHELTER: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OH
MO
WV
VA
AZ
TN
NC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$559k · 3 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$559k
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+47%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONFIDENTIAL - AVAILABLE TO THE IRS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $533k
  • MS
    Mary's Shelter Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue -20%
  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOPE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF WEST PLAINSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +81%
  • CP
    CATALYST PRAYER MOVEMENT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
2
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
3
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
—
4
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
5
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
6
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
7
Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…

Health
8
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
9
Ny New Hope Pregnancy Resource Center
—
10
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
11
Anns New Life Center for Women Inc

Serving women with unplanned pregnancies through services, material and spiritual direction, assist in improving moral and social conditions, advancing Gospel of Jesus, connecting with resources to assist with necessary life needs.

Civil Rights
12
Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ashe Crisis Pregnancy Center; the most unlike its peers is Katies House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONFIDENTIAL - AVAILABLE TO THE IRS: $533,294 · OtherCONFIDENTIAL - AVAILABLE TO THE IRSHOPE CENTER: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $45,120 · Other+4 moreA WOMAN'S CHOICE INC: $19,200 · HealthA WOMAN'S CHOICE IN…PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF WEST PLAINS: $15,000 · HealthPREGNANCY RESOURCE …CHOICES CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $15,000 · HealthCHOICES CRISIS PREG…REDEEMING LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · HealthREDEEMING LOVE MINI…KATIES HOUSE: $15,000 · HealthKATIES HOUSELIFE MORE ABUNDANTLY: $15,000 · HealthLIFE MORE ABUNDANTL…The Mothers Heart: $15,000 · HealthThe Mothers HeartSOUTHSIDE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,606 · HealthSOUTHSIDE CRISIS PR…CROSSROADS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthCROSSROADS PREGNANC…ASHE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $8,000 · HealthASHE CRISIS PREGNAN…ARMS OF GRACE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesLife Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina: $15,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY CARE & HOPE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesMary's Shelter Inc: $14,849 · Human Services
Other$598,414Health$137,806Human Services$59,849

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNTAIN AREA PREGNANCY SERVICES: $17,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHOICES CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetREDEEMING LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetARMS OF GRACE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLife Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina: $15,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetLIFE MORE ABUNDANTLY: $15,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE & HOPE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMary's Shelter Inc: $14,849 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHSIDE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,606 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCROSSROADS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetASHE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carolina Pregnancy Ca…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Carolina Pregnancy Care FellowshipNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carolina Pregnancy Care Fellowship · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heartbeat International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heartbeat International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heartbeat International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home