Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Heartbeat International Inc

Heartbeat international's life-saving mission is to reach and rescue as many lives as possible, around the world, through an effective network of life-affirming pregnancy help to renew communities for life.

$689k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Public Benefit$533kHealth$161kHuman Services$65kReligion$37k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $69,932 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $688,541 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $618,609 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$7,357
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC LAKELAND$19,200
ASCEND WOMEN'S CENTER$17,600
ASHE CPC OF JEFFERSON$8,000
MARY'S SHELTER$7,357
EVERYLIFE INC$6,920
CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC$5,600
PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER SOUTHSIDE VA$5,255
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARMS OF GRACE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 13%LIFE CHOICE PC OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $15k → 14%PREGNANCY CARE AND HOPE CENTER: $15k → 18%MARY'S SHELTER INC: $7k → 15%MARY'S SHELTER: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
OH
MO
WV
VA
AZ
TN
NC
MS
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$559k · 3 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$559k
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONFIDENTIAL - AVAILABLE TO THE IRS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $533k
  • MS
    Mary's Shelter Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOPE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • RL
    REDEEMING LOVE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -25%
  • CC
    CHOICES CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
2
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
3
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
4
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
5
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
6
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
7
Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…

Health
8
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
9
Ny New Hope Pregnancy Resource Center
10
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
11
Anns New Life Center for Women Inc

Serving women with unplanned pregnancies through services, material and spiritual direction, assist in improving moral and social conditions, advancing Gospel of Jesus, connecting with resources to assist with necessary life needs.

Civil Rights
12
Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ashe Crisis Pregnancy Center and the most unlike its peers is Katies House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONFIDENTIAL - AVAILABLE TO THE IRS — $533,294 · OtherCONFIDENTIAL - AVAILABLE TO THE IRS+6 more — $80,120 · Other+6 moreA WOMAN'S CHOICE INC — $19,200 · HealthA WOMAN'S CHOICE …REDEEMING LOVE MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 · HealthREDEEMING LOVE MI…CHOICES CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $15,000 · HealthCHOICES CRISIS PR…LIFE MORE ABUNDANTLY — $15,000 · HealthLIFE MORE ABUNDAN…PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF WEST PLAINS — $15,000 · HealthPREGNANCY RESOURC…The Mothers Heart — $15,000 · HealthThe Mothers HeartSOUTHSIDE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $10,606 · HealthSOUTHSIDE CRISIS …CROSSROADS PREGNANCY CLINIC — $10,000 · HealthCROSSROADS PREGNA…ASHE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $8,000 · HealthASHE CRISIS PREGN…ARMS OF GRACE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY CARE & HOPE CENTER — $15,000 · Human ServicesLife Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina — $15,000 · Human ServicesMary's Shelter Inc — $14,849 · Human Services
Other$613,414Health$122,806Human Services$59,849

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOUNTAIN AREA PREGNANCY SERVICES — $17,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetREDEEMING LOVE MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHOICES CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetARMS OF GRACE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLIFE MORE ABUNDANTLY — $15,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE & HOPE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLife Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina — $15,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetMary's Shelter Inc — $14,849 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHSIDE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $10,606 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCROSSROADS PREGNANCY CLINIC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetASHE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $8,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carolina Pregnancy Care FellowshipNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carolina Pregnancy Care Fellowship · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Heartbeat International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph