· Public charity
Heart of Missouri United Way Inc
The heart of missouri united way works in improve lives of people in need by mobilizing and coordinating the caring power of community resources in mid-missouri.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k12 grants · $297k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOVE COLUMBIA | $198,681 |
| VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER | $135,000 |
| CITY OF REFUGE | $117,459 |
| WILKES BLVD UMC | $116,125 |
| HARRISBURG EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $105,000 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS | $102,270 |
| MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES | $100,000 |
| COLUMBIA CENTER FOR URBAN AGRICUL | $86,920 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLUMBIA AREA | $79,000 |
| FIRST CHANCE FOR CHILDREN | $70,000 |
| GRADE A PLUS INC | $70,000 |
| CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION | $68,014 |
| CHA LOW INCOME SERVICES | $60,000 |
| SERVICES FOR THE INDEPENDENT LIVING | $59,928 |
| HEART OF MISSOURI CASA | $43,103 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against -98% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia8× · 2017–2024 · $922k · revenue +37%
- VAVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $754k · revenue +731%
- UCUNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO8× · 2017–2024 · $690k · revenue ×51 · 83% of their budget
Funded once
- CYCOMO YOUTH WORKSone grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue -100%
- CTCradle to Career Allianceone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -98%
- UYUNIVERSITY Y OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIAone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community Development and Community Center and social services
Nurturing confident young minds. supporting all families.
Children's services fund ('csf') is an innovative way to support child well-being projects. while we are funded by a jackson county sales tax, we are a stand-alone organization led by an independent board. (continued on schedule o)we are…
Promotion of child care excellence in missouri
To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.
Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri
Earlystart carries out its mission "building bridges. inspiring minds. impacting futures." through the earlystart child and family development centers. highly-trained faculty utilize a project-based curriculum in an arts-infused…
We believe every child deserves the opportunity to develop into a healthy, contributing citizen. we engage the community and provide a leading voice to improve the accessibility, affordability and quality of child care.
To ensure equitable access to high-quality care and early education for douglas county, oregon families.
Ccc connects families to resources, collaborates with early childhood education programs, and engages with the community to create a foundation for children to be successful in life.
To offer quality child care at affordable prices.
The center for community services empowers families to break the cycle of poverty through crisis assistance and employment readiness.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Missouri Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Jabberwocky Studios. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds MARY LEE JOHNSTON COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA AREA ↗
- Who funds HARRISBURG EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture ↗
- Who funds WILKES BOULEVARD UNITED METHODIST ↗
- Who funds MID-MISSOURI LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF MID-MO ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds JOB POINT ↗
- Who funds GRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FIRST CHANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Programs Inc ↗
- Who funds CHA LOW INCOME SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF BOONE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Nora Stewart Early Learning Center ↗
- Who funds HEART OF MISSOURI CASA ↗
- Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds Jabberwocky Studios ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Community Playground of Columbia ↗
- Who funds ROCK THE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds UNLIMITED OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Boonslick Heartland YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMO YOUTH WORKS ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS MIDWEST ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM KONNECTIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Boone Electric Community Trust · Boone County Community Trust · Stafford Family Charitable Trust · Missouri Children's Trust Fund · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation · Mfa Oil Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · The Alden Family Foundation · McCortney Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heart of Missouri United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.